Laserfiche WebLink
12/9/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Re: New Elk Mine; Proposed Permanent Impoundments. Request for DWR Comments. <br />leigh.simmons@state.co.us I http: / /mining.state.co.us/ <br />On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Foy - DNR, Caleb <caleb.foy @state.co.us> wrote: <br />Good Morning Leigh, <br />I'm writing in response to the email referenced below, which you sent to Shannon yesterday <br />afternoon. Coincidentally enough, myself and several other DWR staff members are scheduled to <br />visit /tour NEM on the 18th of this month (for their pending plan for augmentation and associated <br />SWSP). Would it be okay if we take a look at the ponds during our visit, and provide comments back <br />to you and /or sit down to meet later that week? <br />Thanks, <br />Caleb Foy, E.I.T. <br />Water Resource Engineer <br />J&17 D. COLORADO <br />Division of Water Resources <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />P 303.866.3581, x8272 I F 303.866.2223 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 818, Denver, CO 80203 <br />Caleb. Foy@ state. co. us I www.water.state.co.us <br />Shannon, <br />My supervisor, Mike Boulay, left you a phone message introducing the topic of this email. If you have <br />questions you can contact him, or you can contact me directly. <br />New Elk Coal Company (NECC) is proposing to retain two of the existing sediment control ponds at the <br />New Elk mine as permanent impoundments, in a revision to their currently approved reclamation plan. <br />Technical Revision number 68 (TR68) is an extensive revision to the New Elk mine permit (permit <br />number C- 1981 -012), which has been in the review process for over a year. The content of the revision <br />is varied, much of which is of no relevance to the Division of Water Resources, however part of the <br />revision proposes to alter the reclamation plan to retain two ponds (ponds 004 and 008) as permanent <br />impoundments. In the cover letter that accompanied the revision application NECC stated that: TR -68 <br />also proposes to retain pond 004, below the DWP, and pond 008 below the RDA as permanent <br />impoundments under Rule 4.05.9. Pond 004 is being kept primarily because of the excellent riparian <br />species that have developed in this over -sized impoundment, which under the current plan, would be <br />eliminated during reclamation operations. Pond 008 is one of the few water sources north of the <br />highway in the vicinity of the mine and would be beneficial as a water source for wildlife that will likely <br />utilize the reclaimed RDA upon permanent closure of the mine site. <br />As a result of an oversight DWR was not consulted at the time application was found complete. I am <br />now in the position of requesting comments from DWR on the proposed changes when the technical <br />issues have been otherwise resolved. <br />Background context: <br />The New Elk mine is an underground coal mine in Las Animas county, (permit number C- 1981 -012). <br />The mine is situated between Weston and Stonewall on Highway 12, and the permit area straddles the <br />Purgatoire River at an elevation of around 7400'. <br />Pond 004 is situated on land owned by Colorado Parks and Wildlife (who have provided a letter stating <br />their support of the plan to retain the pond), between highway 12 and the river. It treats the runoff from a <br />reclaimed development waste pile. The pond itself is very well vegetated and seldom holds a significant <br />amount of water. The two pictures below were taken during inspections in October and September of <br />this year. The first picture was taken from the emergency spillway looking north across the pond and <br />shows the primary spillway riser. The second picture was taken from the NW corner of the pond, <br />hftps: //m ai I .googl e.com /m ai I /u/0 / ?ui = 2 &i k= 095bb4d299 &view = pt &search= i nbox &m sg= l 4aO7fa42440abb7 &dsgt =1 &si m l = 14aO7fa42440abb7 3/6 <br />