My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:50 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 2:50:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/5/2014
Doc Name
Investigation Report of Sediment Laden Water Discharge at Revenue Mine in October, 2014.
From
Greg Lewicki
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Fortune Revenue Silver Mines Inc ACZ Project ID: L21373 <br />ACZID VVORKNUM •� QUAL, DESCR PTI w <br />L21373 -01 WG374054 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time <br />WG374059 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />SM2540D N1 See Case Narrative. <br />SM2540D RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />L21373 -02 WG374054 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG374059 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />L21373 -03 WG374054 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG374059 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />L21373 -04 WG374054 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG374059 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />L21373 -05 WG374054 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG374059 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />HE Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />HE Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />HE Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />HE Analysis performed past holding time. Method holding time <br />is less than or equal to 7 days and sample was received <br />with less than half of the holding time remaining (refer to <br />item C5 of ACZ's Terms & Conditions). <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />H3 Sample was received and analyzed past holding time. <br />N1 See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />L21373- 1411211444 Page 27 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.