My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:50 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 2:50:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/5/2014
Doc Name
Investigation Report of Sediment Laden Water Discharge at Revenue Mine in October, 2014.
From
Greg Lewicki
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Conclusions <br />Based on all the information gathered, this author does not believe that any environmental damage was <br />done to Sneffels Creek or Canyon Creek or any water downstream. The event was short (approx.18 <br />hours) and due to very prompt action on the part of the mine officials, the situation was corrected as <br />fast as humanly possible. As described above, the effects of the discharge were basically the same as <br />an intense summer thundershower, which occur frequently over the course of a year from May through <br />October. Since the crushed andesite host rock at the bottom of the raise bore had no vein material at <br />all, this material is completely inert and the water was only problematic from the standpoint of <br />suspended clay. The drainage basin of Sneffels Creek has many old mine dumps and portals which do <br />have vein material and contribute to dissolved ions of concern. This is particularly evident from recent <br />samples taken from Governor Basin at the top of the Sneffels Creek watershed. <br />However, the mine officials should have anticipated earlier that water could potentially come out of the <br />raise bore in much greater quantities than what was observed in the pilot hole. The low volume of water <br />in the pilot hole lulled everyone into a false sense that there would be no discharge from the raise bore. <br />Also, the employees that were working this area during the early morning hours did not report that there <br />was significant water coming out and that it was picking up sediment. Training of underground <br />employees to keep a watchful eye on the discharge water has been undertaken. <br />The author of this report, Greg Lewicki, recommends that all mine employees, surface and <br />underground, have some basic instruction about what is environmentally acceptable or not with respect <br />to mine water, water discharge, and the operation of the ditches and ponds on the surface. The mine <br />managers have committed to this additional training. <br />Page 15 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.