My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-31_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2014-10-31_PERMIT FILE - C1981044A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2017 9:19:47 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 8:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/31/2014
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Iron and pH values are similar for the two wells. Conductivity levels in the Okie Plaza Well are somewhat higher than <br />the levels in 9 Mine Well as would be expected since the Okie Plaza Well is deeper and further from the outcrop. <br />The declines in the piezometric levels in the Middle Sandstone observed in Figures 12 through 17, in Section 2.04 -7, <br />Hydrology Information, are apparently related to dewatering and subsidence associated with Mines 5 and 6. The <br />declines in the levels in Wells 81 -01 and 83 -01 between 1988 and 1990 appear to have leveled off since the middle of <br />1990. Water levels in these two wells and in Well TR -7A measured during 1991 are similar to the levels measured in <br />1983 and 1984. The slight recovery from 1984 through 1988 is apparently the result of a shift in the location of <br />mining to an area further up -dip. Water level fluctuations since 1983 are greater in Well 81 -01 as compared to Wells <br />TR -7A and 83 -01, as would be expected since this well is closer to the location of mine dewatering. <br />The water levels in Well 83 -02 show a different pattern. The water level decline of about 150 feet from 1987 to mid - <br />1989 in Well 83 -02 is determined to be related to mine dewatering as No. 5 Mine workings approached the location of <br />the well. The more abrupt 200 foot decline in water levels observed near the end of 1989 and beginning of 1990 is <br />thought to be a drawdown response due to subsidence, as its location is only a few hundred feet horizontally from as F <br />seam longwall panel, which was mined in a similar timeframe. <br />Wells TR -4 and 83 -03 are located at greater distance horizontally from the active operations for Mines 5 and 6. Water <br />levels in Well TR4 appear to be related to the fluctuations observed on all three of the down - gradient Middle <br />Sandstone wells, 81 -01, 83 -01, and 83 -02. The water level decline in TR4 prior to 1984, and the subsequent recovery <br />up to 1988, closely parallels the trends observed in wells 81 -01 and 83 -01. The decline during the first part of 1991 <br />also parallels the trend in these two wells. The rapid decline during the last part of 1989 and the first part of 1990, <br />however, appears to follow the trend observed in well 83 -02, although the magnitude of decline is considerably less. <br />Well 83 -03 is the Middle Sandstone monitoring well located furthest (more than 1.5 miles) from active underground <br />operations for Mines 5 and 6. The water levels in Well 83 -03 show a pattern that requires further explanation given <br />that potentiometric levels at the well are under flowing artesian conditions. The overall trend for this well from 1984 <br />through 1992 suggests a decline in potentiometric levels in this well of about 25 feet based on the linear regression <br />line shown on Figure 17, Section 2.04 -7, Hydrology Information. The occasional sharp decline followed by rapid <br />recovery which appear in the time plot are, however, likely the result of errors in obtaining an accurate measurement <br />of equilibrium artesian pressures within the well. The long -term decline could be a pressure response due to the <br />overall drop in piezometric levels in the Middle Sandstone in the vicinity of Mines 5 and 6. On the other hand, there <br />was no apparent relationship between the fluctuations observed in Well 83 -03 with the fluctuations observed in other <br />Middle Sandstone wells, due perhaps to possible pressure measurements fluctuations and the further distance to the <br />well. <br />Based upon the 1992 piezometric map (Map 13), the ground water gradient in the Middle Sandstone ranges from 120 <br />feet per mile to the southwest to 60 feet per mile to the southwest. The drop in piezometric levels in the Middle <br />Sandstone unit above the subsided longwall mine panels in the F and E coal seams has created a potentiometric <br />gradient to the south in the vicinity of the longwall panels. <br />The rock slope entries between the `B" and the "H" seams are not anticipated to significantly modify the probable <br />hydrologic consequences. The rock slopes will be approximately 1,650 feet long, starting in the `B" seam at an <br />elevation of 5,147 feet, and ending in the "H" seam at an elevation of 5,622 feet. The ramps will be mined at a 15 <br />percent grade. Geologic characteristics of the area are known from borehole 94 -08. The ramps penetrate a series of <br />coal seams (E, F, and H seams), shales and sandstones. Three sandstone strata separated by shales will be <br />encountered in the rock slopes at the following intervals (from the bottom of the rock slopes in the "E: seams): <br />• 254 —528 feet (sandstone 275 feet thick) <br />• 828 — 962 feet (sandstone 134 feet thick) <br />• 1,039 —1,180 feet (sandstone 141 feet thick) <br />These three sandstones form the Middle Sandstone, which in several other exploration boreholes is composed of only <br />TR14 -36 2.05 -41 Revised 03/20/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.