Laserfiche WebLink
X= 3.lnLsj <br />S, <br />3 =(T b) i� <br />ka <br />T, is the coal transmissivity, and ba and Ka are thickness and hydraulic conductivity for leaky strata or "aquitard ". <br />While it is difficult to determine these parameters, the analysis was performed for a leaky range (represented by <br />envelope strata hydraulic conductivity), which is thought to represent bounding conditions. <br />For coal transmissivity, Tc equal to 30 ftZ /day (from page 2.04 -14), so equal to 700 feet (initial head is approximately <br />700 feet above the seams), ba equal to 100 ft, and ka equal to 0.01 ft/day, a 1 ft. drawdown is estimated to occur at a <br />distance of 3,300 feet from the mine perimeter, and the 5 ft. drawdown at a distance 2,700 feet from the mine <br />perimeter. If the enveloping strata have conductivity only 0.001 ft/day, the 1 ft. drawdown occurs at 10,400 feet. <br />The extent of drawdown should be nearer the low estimate based on the observed very low distributed mine inflow <br />rates and the locus of inflows in fracture zones. Leakage will dampen uniform drawdown within the mined seams, <br />and fracture discontinuities will locally overwhelm it. <br />Ground water in the William's Fork alluvium will not be directly affected by underground mining under this permit. <br />Mine water discharge to the William's Fork River is not anticipated to have a measurable effect on water levels or <br />water quality in the William's Fork Alluvium. <br />Ground water in the Yampa River alluvium will not be directly affected by the development of underground entries <br />beneath the alluvium under this permit. A summary of water quality data collected from Yampa alluvial wells in Big <br />Bottom is found on pages 2.04.7 -23a through 2.04.7 -23h. As can be seem from this data, quality of water in the <br />alluvium is variable. Quality and quantity is highly subject to seasonal fluctuations. <br />The water quality of all three sandstone aquifers does not indicate any significant trends or adverse impacts related to <br />mining at Mines 5 and 6. <br />The piezometric declines in the Trout Creek Sandstone are thought to be related primarily to pumping of the three <br />mine water supply wells completed in this unit, and not from mining the overlying E and F coal seams. The <br />piezometric levels represented by water levels in the No. 5 Mine Well and the Okie Plaza Well, recovered to the levels <br />measured in 1986 through 1988. The recovery of the two wells is apparently from reduction in pumping for use since <br />both wells are used for water supply as well as monitoring. The recovery would not have occurred if the declines <br />observed in 1988 and 1989 were due to dewatering of the E and F coal seams, because mine dewatering has <br />continued. <br />1991 levels in both the No. 5 Mine Well and the Okie Plaza Well appear to be 25 to 50 feet lower than the levels <br />measured when monitoring was initiated in 1985 and 1987, respectively. Water level fluctuations of up to 250 feet <br />have been observed which are undoubtedly related to pumping for use, but no seasonal pattern is evidenced or <br />expected. It is likely that the fluctuation is related to pumping for use. Since the base of the E Coal Seam in the <br />vicinity of both Trout Creek Sandstone wells is above the current piezometric level in these two wells, it is not likely <br />that the recent fluctuations in piezometric levels in the Trout Creek Sandstone are related to mine dewatering in the <br />overlying E and F coal seams. <br />Plots of field conductivity measurements for the two Trout Creek Sandstone wells are presented in Figure 58a, and <br />Exhibit 42, Figures 58A and 58B. Plots of laboratory dissolved iron measurements for the Two Trout Creek <br />Sandstone wells are presented in Figures 58C and 58D, and plots of field pH measurements are presented in Figures <br />58E and 58F. These plots of field conductivity, dissolved iron, and pH measurements for the Two Trout Creek <br />Sandstone Wells do not indicate any trend which could be indicative of water quality impacts related to mining. <br />Dissolved iron concentrations show considerable variation, which may be due to sampling and sample preparation. <br />TR14 -36 2.05 -40 Revised 03/20/14 <br />