Laserfiche WebLink
All major components of the system are shown on the Structures and Renewable Resources Map (Map 25). <br />The No. 5 Mine sump is located in the lowest structural portion of the No. 5 Mine. All water encountered in the No. 5 <br />Mine is pumped to the sump. In addition, boreholes were drilled from the No. 5 Mine to the No. 6 Mine to allow <br />pumping of water encountered in the No. 6 Mine to the No. 5 Mine Sump. The locations of these holes were <br />determined based on water volumes encountered. <br />Water from the No. 5 Mine sump is pumped to the surface through two 20 -inch boreholes. The boreholes were drilled <br />vertically from the Williams Fork River valley approximately 520 feet to the No. 5 Mine sump. It was anticipated that <br />a chemical treatment system would be needed to treat the mine water discharge, however experience has shown that <br />chemical treatment is not required. Presently, there is no chemical treatment system, but if significant changes in <br />water quality were to occur, an appropriate system could be designed and installed. Due to failure of the downhole <br />pump, the pump was replaced in 2011 with a pump of similar design and capacity. <br />A series of three ponds have been constructed in the Williams Fork River floodplain to settle out suspended solids <br />from the raw mine water. Each pond has a capacity of 60,000 cu -ft, which translates into a three -hour retention time <br />per pond, at design capacity. Based on the system design, only two of the three ponds are in service at a given time. <br />The total retention time is six hours. Operating experience and testing by Nalco indicates this to be a conservative <br />design. A retention time of approximately twenty minutes is adequate for settling. The ponds are designed to <br />adequately retain and settle suspended solids for a maximum inflow of 2,500 gpm. It has been estimated that the total <br />combine pumping requirements from the No. 5 and No. 6 Mines would be 1,300 —1,800 gpm, however, to date actual <br />required pumping volumes have been substantially less than estimated. <br />In addition to the conservative design, internal baffles (snow fencing) installed perpendicular to the direction of flow, <br />have been used in the past to both slow flows and lengthen the flow path through the ponds. While the baffles <br />increase the settling efficiency of each pond by slowing the flow and increasing residence time to allow suspended <br />solids to drop out, experience has shown that they are generally not necessary for the ponds to function as designed. <br />Similar to the optional chemical treatment system, MCM will monitor discharge water quality, and reserves the option <br />to utilize baffles if necessary to maintain effective treatment and control. <br />The general flow through the system is as follows: mine water enters on the eastern end of the system, water flows in <br />a westerly direction through the first pond (P5), water enters a pipe on the western end of pond (P5) and flows to the <br />eastern end of the second pond (P6) (in this description, ponds P5 and P6 are the two functional ponds), water then <br />flows in an easterly direction towards the discharge pipe. Both the inter -pond linkage and the discharge pipe are six <br />(6) feet above the pond bottom. The manipulation of the valves on the inlet, outlets, and inter -pond linkage allow the <br />water to be directed and discharged from any pond at any time. The general flow schematic for the pond system is <br />presented on Figure 53, Pond Flow Schematic. The general pond system design is shown on Figure 54, Settling <br />Ponds - Plan View. Figure 55, Pond Cross - Section A -A', and Figure 56, Pond Cross - Section B -B', are north -south <br />and east -west pond cross - sections. The locations of these cross - sections are shown on the Drainage and Sediment <br />Control Map (Map 26). <br />In order to prevent water from seeping out of the ponds, they have been lined with bentonite. The bentonite was <br />applied to the pond bottom and embankments and mixed with the surface soil layer. The heterogeneous mass of <br />bentonite and soil was wetted and then rolled to form a good seal. The embankments are sloped at 311:1 V and should <br />not present any operational problems. <br />Each of the ponds has a dewatering device located in its bottom. Once a pond is filled with settled solids, it will be <br />taken out of service and solids removed. The water that is drained from the pond will flow into a sump and then be <br />pumped from the sump into the first functioning pond of the system. This will prevent any discharge of water <br />containing elevated suspended solids, into the Williams Fork River. <br />Two ramps, as shown on Map 27, provide equipment access for pond maintenance and sediment removal. A <br />contractor will be utilized in the maintenance operations. Accumulated sediments will be hauled to the waste disposal <br />site or placed into an approved landfill. This material may be subject to soil and overburden testing, and depending on <br />TR14 -36 2.05 -12 Revised 09/08/14 <br />