My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-11-25_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-11-25_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:38 PM
Creation date
11/25/2014 10:17:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/25/2014
Doc Name
Comment Letter
From
History Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
MR165
Email Name
SLB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
€CI <br />HISTORY <br />November 20, 2014 <br />Susan L. Burgmaier <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RECEIVED <br />NOV 2 5 2014 <br />Division of &ecla etyion, <br />Mining <br />Re: Bowie No. 2 Mine (Permit No. C- 1996 -083), Minor Revision No. 165 (MR -165), Section 5 Road, Delta County, <br />Colorado (CHS # 66988) <br />Dear Ms. Burgmaier: <br />Thank you for your correspondence dated November 18, 2014 and received by our office via electronic mail on <br />November 20, 2014 requesting expedited review and comment on the subject undertaking. We again thank you for <br />including reference maps and GIS with your request for review as this information greatly facilitates our review <br />process. <br />Following our expedited review, it is our opinion that a finding of no historic properties affected [36 CFR <br />800.4(d)(1)] is appropriate for the proposed undertaking. This determination is based on the negative results of <br />prior cultural resources inventories within the APE that were completed in 2004, 2007 and 2011. <br />In addition to contacting the Bureau of Land Management, where the proposed road is sited, the Section 106 <br />consultation process does involve other consulting parties such as the local governments and Tribes, which as <br />stipulated in 36 CFR 800.3 are required to be notified of the undertaking. Additional information provided by <br />these or other consulting parties may cause our office to re- evaluate our comments and recommendations. <br />Should unidentified archaeological resources be discovered in the course of the projects, work must be interrupted until <br />the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register of Historic Places eligibility criteria (36 CFR 60.4) <br />in consultation with our office. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mark Tobias, Section <br />106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866 -4674 or mark.tobias a.state.co.us. <br />Sincerely, <br />/ LA, <br />Edward C. Nichols <br />State Historic Preservation Officer <br />ECN /MAT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.