Laserfiche WebLink
The model was set up with two vertical layers to allow for the presence of zero - gradient <br />boundaries within the reservoirs at various locations in the Poudre valley. The vertical division <br />allows underflow in the lower layer (layer 2) relative to unimpeded flow across the reservoir. <br />Groundwater elevations in the model were defined by head boundaries estimated based on <br />regional topography, reported groundwater levels where measured, and the artificially lowered <br />water table within the mine pit. Head boundaries assigned to Layers 1 and 2 are shown on <br />Figures 4 and 5, respectively. <br />• Regional Boundaries: Head boundaries at the model edges were assigned such that the <br />water table matches regional topographic slope, with localized flow converging toward <br />the Poudre River. Elevations are expressed as feet relative to NAVD. Topographic <br />elevations across the model area range from 4700 in the north and west, to 4680 in the <br />east. Head boundaries of 4685 and 4660 were assigned to the west and east model <br />boundaries, respectively, to approximate a water table occurring at about 15 -20 feet <br />below grade at these locations. The head boundaries along the model edges were assigned <br />to both layers. <br />• River Boundary: River boundary cells were assigned to match approximate groundwater <br />elevations observed nearby onsite, and to match approximate topography further from the <br />site. The Poudre River head boundary ranged from 4680 to 4665 from west to east. It can <br />be seen that a portion of the river boundary is assigned to Layer 1 (Figure 4) and the <br />eastern portion to Layer 2 (Figure 5). This split occurs where the assigned river head <br />drops below the break between Layer 1 and Layer 2, at elevation 4658. <br />• Mine Pit Head Boundary: Head boundary cells were assigned within the pit at elevations <br />4645 and 4650, as defined based on pit bottom elevation and observed groundwater <br />elevations (Figure 1). The pit head boundaries are assigned in Layer 2 only. <br />A soil hydraulic conductivity value of 10-2 cm/s (28 ft. /day) was assigned to the model domain. <br />This value is typical for sand and gravel with little or no fines, as was documented in the slurry <br />wall exploration logs. A hydraulic conductivity value of 10,000 ft. /day was assigned to the <br />reservoirs along the Poudre, within Layer 1, to represent a zero - gradient boundary. Recharge <br />from rainfall was assigned at 3.5 inches /year, and evaporative losses of 71 inches /year were <br />assigned to the reservoirs. <br />Computed baseline water table elevations were compared with measurements available for the <br />Greeley 35th Avenue Mine property. Comparing the contours on Figure 6 with those on Figure <br />2, similar water table elevations and inward gradients are apparent. A general easterly gradient <br />with convergence toward the river and 35th Avenue Mine can be seen on Figures 4 and 5. <br />