My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:46 PM
Creation date
11/19/2014 9:40:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/10/2014
Doc Name
WWE Subsidence Impact Evaluation - PR14 Spruce Stomp
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIB Exhibit 23 Spruce Stomp Subsidence Evaluation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Potential Subsidence Impacts of Longwall Mining in the Spruce Stomp Lease Area <br />to Aquatic Life and Water Supply <br />However, the terminal points of landslide /debris flow deposits are located on the north and <br />south edge of the West Fork Terror Creek channel where the flow gradient begins to increase <br />eastward ( Dunrud, 1989). These deposits are visible on a detailed satellite or aerial image of <br />the area. The northern, more extensive deposit shows no sign of recurring movement. The <br />lower part of the southern slide, however, shows signs of renewed movement since it was <br />initially deposited. These landslides /debris flows consist of unconsolidated basalt boulders <br />and Wasatch clays that were remobilized during periods of very high precipitation, <br />precipitation that was probably much higher than any recorded during the approximately <br />hundred -year history of coal mining in the North Fork Valley. There is no indication of any <br />recent movement. <br />Subsidence related to longwall mining has the potential to trigger landslides, debris flows and <br />rockfalls in areas currently prone to wasting events. However, these events have occurred <br />naturally in this area for a long time without adversely impacting the continued existence of <br />wildlife and vegetation. <br />5.3 Reasonableness Checking— Comparison to Nearby Mines <br />Mr. Dunrud has over 17 years' experience monitoring subsidence above more than 25 longwall <br />panels at the nearby West Elk Mine. During this time, Mr. Dunrud reports that cracks were not <br />observed in the stream and impacts to stream flow were not identified. The overall magnitude <br />and scope of subsidence impacts modeled for the Potential Project were compared to those <br />observed for the West Elk Mine and were found to be comparable. <br />6.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO WEST FORK TERROR CREEK'S ASSOCIATED <br />AQUATIC LIFE <br />Projections for the impacts to aquatic life in West Fork Terror Creek resulting from the Potential <br />Project's subsidence were developed using the existing habitat and biologic conditions, the <br />sediment transport analysis (Appendix 2), and Mr. Dunrud's subsidence characterization <br />(Appendix 4). The potential impacts are summarized in Table 7. <br />121 - 014.000 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 21 <br />January 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.