My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-10-10_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:46 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 12:47:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/10/2014
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIA Exhibit 15 Subsidence Prediction
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The important factors and conditions that may influence the stability of the outcrop <br />barrier pillar are fairly well defined. The coal outcrop is well defined; it is further known that <br />at most locations along the outcrop, both seams are burnt out. At some locations, such as <br />the Bowie #2 Mine portal entries, little coal burn was present. The depth of the coal bum in <br />the horizontal direction is much less defined; we understand that based on the mining <br />experience in the area, the width of the burnt -out zone has been assumed to reach up to <br />300 feet. According to this assumption, the projected burn line, which coincides with the <br />southern mine limit, was estimated. <br />Mining limits in areas adjoining the outcrop barrier pillar are usually dictated by the <br />occurrence of oxidized (weathered) coal close to the outcrop. Such coal is of lower quality <br />and weaker than the good quality coal and it is not mined. <br />The presence of the burnt -out coal close to its outcrop brings about an additional <br />factor that is of importance for potential subsidence or stability problems in the vicinity of <br />the outcrop barrier pillar. The old coal fires, when reaching to significant depths into the <br />mountain, created a void space; the overburden lost its support and subsided. Distinct <br />fractures may have been developed above such subsidence features as described by <br />Dunrud (1976) in the Somerset - Paonia area. <br />It is evident that potential subsidence or stability problems in the vicinity of the <br />outcrop barrier pillars cannot be ruled out. Landslides of a significant extent have <br />developed close to the coal outcrop at the old Farmers Mine; it cannot be ruled out that <br />they are related to the collapse (crushing or sliding) of the outcrop barrier pillar as the <br />mining proceeded too close to the outcrop. <br />GEO -HYDRO Consulting, Inc. (1983) provides guidelines for a necessary width of <br />an outcrop barrier pillar in different geologic and hydrologic conditions. According to their <br />evaluation, a pillar width of some 50 feet should be sufficient in most conditions of the <br />Bowie #1 Mine to prevent crushing or sliding of the outcrop barrier pillar. <br />A barrier pillar of any width, assumed or otherwise, composed primarily of burnt <br />and /or oxidized coal may not be sufficient to minimize the effects of subsidence near the <br />outcrop. The Operator plans to leave one row of developed pillars (competent coal) <br />adjacent to the burnline (the point that poor quality coal is intercepted), and that this pillar <br />(100' width of competent coal) should prevent the potential crushing, sliding, orotherfailure <br />PR -14 -14- 03/14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.