Laserfiche WebLink
11/18/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: Dewatering Wells and Water Tested for Radioactive Material <br />STATE, OF Hernandez - DNR Alysha < alysha.hernandez@state.co.us> <br />COL,ORAI, <br />Zuber - DNR, Rob <rob.zuber @state.co.us> Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:29 PM <br />To: Alysha Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez @ state.co.us> <br />Alysha — <br />Please file this Southfield email under Public Correspondence and name it "Email from Linda Saunders." <br />Thanks, <br />Me <br />Mike, <br />Please answer these questions <br />1. How many dewatering wells were on our property? And where are they <br />located? <br />Is there evidence of them today? <br />I know that the North Well is now MWNW. <br />2. How were the inflows determined? <br />3. What was Al Weaver's response to your question 1 (July 17,1998) <br />It appears that relatively precise measurements are provided for mine inflows <br />in acre -feet. The text states that the mine inflows were estimated. Please <br />discuss the methodologies used to estimate the inflows In future AHR's. <br />I could not find the 1998 or 1999 AHR Reports. <br />4. Why were the 1986 inflows 142.5 ac /ft (Bishop, Brogden, Rump) and the 1992 <br />156 ac /ft much higher and the 1988, 1989, 1994,1994 when reported in gallons <br />per minute. <br />5. Did EFCI follow the recommendation of their geologist, Glen E. Miller who did <br />the bore sampling <br />https: / /mail.googl e.com /m ai I /u/0 / ?ui =2 &i k= e29129fcb5 &view =pt &search= i nbox &th= 149bfa9Obl90ff44 &si m l= 149bfa9Obl9Off44 1/2 <br />