My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-09-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-09-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:47:37 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 9:09:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/11/2014
Doc Name
Email from Linda Saunders
From
Linda Saunders
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Public Correspondence
Email Name
RDZ
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11/18/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: EFCI mining and MWNW <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br />rob.zuberCstate.co.us I http: / /mining. state. co. us <br />On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Linda Saunders <saunders615 @live -com> wrote: <br />Does the inflow report in the AHR have the water that was removed from MW10 as well? <br />How long was it used to dewater the mine? <br />Linda <br />Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:07:14 -0600 <br />Subject: EFCI mining and MWNW <br />From: rob.zuber @state.co.us <br />To: saunder-s6l5@live.com <br />Linda - <br />On September 8, 2014 you sent an email asking me, "Did EFCI mine through MWNW like they did MW 10 <br />next to the refuse pile at 400 feet ?" <br />would say that this well was not "mined through" as you suggest. This well was initially a dewatering well <br />and in 2003 (according to the PAP) was converted to a monitoring well. Thus, it is very likely that the mine <br />workings existed before the well. <br />As for the pulling of pillars, other than the information on the mine closure map, which we have discussed, <br />do not have any information related to this question. <br />As you know, this well is the subject of violation CV2013002, which has yet to be resolved. Determination of <br />EFCI's responsibility regarding this well is integral to the resolution of this violation. <br />Do you have any other particular questions related to this matter? <br />Thanks, <br />Rob <br />Rob % b- <br />Specialist <br />Regulatory Coat <br />v � <br />P 303.866.3567, extension 8113 1 F 303,832.8106 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br />rob.zuber@state.co.us I http: / /mining.state.co.us <br />https: / /mail.googl e.com /m ai I /u/0 / ?ui =2 &i k= e29129fcb5 &view =pt &search= i nbox &th= 149bf99ebd69d6f5 &si m l= 149bf99ebd69d6f5 2/2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.