My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2014-10-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:49:07 PM
Creation date
11/14/2014 8:14:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/21/2014
Doc Name
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The monitoring program is described in detail in Section 2.04.7. <br />B) PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />In support of its original application to mine the Nucla and Nucla East properties (now the New <br />Horizon 1 and New Horizon 2 mining areas), Peabody Coal Company performed extensive and <br />detailed computer modeling to determine probable hydrologic consequences of mining. Details of <br />the computer modeling are available in Attachment 2.05.6(3) -2 (formerly Peabody Tab 17 ). <br />This discussion incorporates water monitoring results through the spring of 2001, which have been <br />valuable in predicting long term probable hydrologic consequences. <br />Peabody summarized the discussion in Attachment 2.05.6(3) -2 (formerly Peabody Tab 17) by listing <br />the probable hydrologic consequences and the results of the analysis of each impact. This <br />summary is presented as Table 2.05.6(3) -1 on the following pages. The table has been modified <br />to incorporate new findings with both the New Horizon #1 and #2 mines. As can be seen, all of the <br />probable impacts have been determined to have no short or long term significance or a plan has <br />been presented to mitigate those determined to have some significance. <br />Following the summary table is a detailed discussion of each of the potential impacts to the <br />hydrologic balance. <br />Revised September 2014 JR -64) 2.05.6(3) -17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.