Laserfiche WebLink
10/22/2014 <br />STATE OF <br />COLORADO <br />State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Re: Will not attend the meeting <br />Re: Will not attend the meeting <br />1 message <br />Berry - DNR, David <david.berry@state.co.us> <br />Ted Coulter <tedcoulter @yahoo.com> Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:34 PM <br />Reply -To: Ted Coulter <tedcoulter @yahoo.com> <br />To: "Bevy - DNR, David" <david.berry@state.co.us >, "Rich A. Munson" <rich @ramunson.com> <br />Cc: Linda Saunders <saunders615 @live.com >, Paula Coulter <pauIacoulter @com cast. net >, Tena Gallagher <br /><tena @aol.com >, George Patterson <efcoal @gmail.com >, Alysha Hernandez - DNR <br /><alysha.hernandez @ state.co.us>, Daniel Hernandez - DNR <daniel.hernandez @ state.co.us>, Rob Zuber - DNR <br /><rob.zuber @state.co.us >, Jeff Fugate <jeff.fugate @state.co.us> <br />Dear Mr. Berry <br />In regard to your email of 12:16 PM today, addressing the issue of the "apparent lack of interest <br />and availability of the EFCI and " Vento representatives" as a causation of the cancellation of <br />today's agreed and scheduled meeting, please be aware of the following: <br />The Vento Representatives are and have been more than willing to "meet" with you, your <br />staff and other Colorado governmental representatives at the convenience of those parties; <br />The Vento Representatives have been trying to keep this entire matter together in a coherent <br />and positive format from the very beginning; <br />The Vento Representatives (and apparently the State of Colorado governmental <br />representatives) are now aware that any such meeting will require the presence of Mr. R.A. <br />Munson and /or legal representative(s) of Energy Fuels; <br />The Vento Representative have learned from prior attempts at resolution to their issues, that <br />meeting without a written response to the Vento Representatives issues before such a meeting <br />begins is a guarantee to failure to achieve the goals of such meetings. <br />Please be advised that EFCI's refusal or delay in response can not be connected to the current <br />Vento Representatives demand for a written response to the issues presented any more than <br />EFCI's refusal or delay can be related to the DRMS and the MLRB prior delays or inability to <br />respond to all of the Vento Representatives issues raised in the past years. The Vento <br />Representatives also expect more effective communication and efforts towards issue <br />identification and resolution than is currently occurring and are pleased to see that there is now <br />agreement that they have not received it in the past. <br />Personal regards <br />Ted Coulter <br />Heir - Estate of Irene Coulter <br />The information contained in this transmission, which may be confidential and proprietary, is <br />only for the intended recipients. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this <br />transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or electronic mail and confirm <br />that you deleted this transmission and the reply from your electronic mail system. <br />On Friday, May 16, 2014 12:16 PM, "Berry - DNR, David" <david.berry@state.co.us> wrote: <br />Mr. Munson, Ms. Saunders, Ms. Gallagher, Mr. and Ms. Coulter - Given the of apparent lack <br />of interest and availability of the EFCI and Vento representatives, the previously agreed and <br />scheduled meeting for later today is cancelled. <br />We will expect a written response from EFCI by Monday. Please include the previously <br />https:H mail. google. com /mai I /u/0 / ?ui =2 &i k= b46be11 b9e& view =pt& search = i nbox &th= 146065Oc4637d922 &si m l= 146065Oc4637d922 1/3 <br />