My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-10-10_REVISION - C1996083 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-10-10_REVISION - C1996083 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:48:48 PM
Creation date
10/14/2014 12:42:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/10/2014
Doc Name
Transmittal of Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Richard Rudin
Type & Sequence
PR14
Email Name
SLB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the permittee to ensure the protection of all alluvial valley floors during surface coal <br />mining and reclamation operations and continued until all bonds are released in <br />accordance with Rule 4.24.4. <br />XVIII. Operations on Prime Farmland <br />The Bowie No. 2 Mine will not disturb or affect any prime farmland. <br />XIX. Mountaintop Removal <br />This section does not apply to the Bowie No. 2 Mine permit application. <br />XX. Operations on Steep Slopes <br />The main haul road, Gob Piles 41, 92, and 94, and several gob vent boreholes are located <br />on slopes in excess of 20 °. The refuse areas, permitted under Rules 4.09, 4.10, and 4.11 <br />and being constructed as valley fill structures, will result in a variance from approximate <br />original contour. BRL has not requested, and the Division does not propose to approve <br />any variances pertaining to steep slope mining and approximate original contour for the <br />haul road or gob vent boreholes. <br />A. The Division does not propose to approve a variance from meeting approximate <br />original contour for reclaimed areas. <br />B. The applicant has not proposed to dispose of woody plant materials in the backfill <br />beneath the highwall (4.27.3(6)). <br />C. The Division does not propose to approve of the construction of an unlined or <br />unprotected drainage channel on backfill (4.27.3(7)). <br />D. The applicant has not proposed alternative specifications and practices for operations <br />on steep slopes and reclamation of these operations (4.27.3(8)). <br />E. Land above the highwall will not be disturbed in order to blend the highwall and <br />backfilled area, control runoff, provide access to the area above the highwall or <br />temporarily store overburden (4.27.4(3)). <br />F. The Division does not propose to approve of disposal of excess spoil on a pre- existing <br />bench (4.27.5). <br />XXL In -Situ Processing <br />There will not be any in -situ processing at the Bowie No. 2 Mine site. <br />Page 44 of 46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.