Laserfiche WebLink
Susan Burgmaier -4- September 12, 2014 <br />BRL - The language regarding flow monitoring on the West Fork of Terror Creek was <br />revised on pages 2.05 -126 and 2.05 -169. <br />32. Issue resolved. <br />Rule 2.05.6(6) Subsidence Survey, Subsidence Monitoring, and Subsidence Control Plan <br />42. a. Issue resolved. <br />Rule 2.04.7 - Hydrology Description <br />Rule 2.04.7(1) - Ground Water Information <br />47. Issue resolved. <br />49. BRL provided details of the proposed new wells, as requested. The generalized <br />Monitoring Well Completion Drawing will be a useful addition to the permit. <br />The location of the two proposed wells is shown on maps 9, 10A and 10B. Using the contour <br />lines to approximate, the site is at an elevation of 7800'. Viewing the points overlaid on an <br />aerial image suggests that they are -180m west of the WAPA Transmission line access road. <br />The projected potentiometric surfaces on Maps 10A and 10B show a discontinuity of aligned <br />with a northwest /southeast trending fault line. Those maps each show significantly higher head <br />values ( >200') to the east of the fault line compared to the west. If the maps accurately depict <br />the surface, the inference must be that the hydrologic connection between the two sides of the <br />fault is very limited. Although wells drilled at those locations might be down -dip of the majority <br />of the workings, the fact that they are on the other side of the fault makes it unlikely that they <br />would monitor water directly affected by the western workings. The wells could not be <br />considered to be down gradient of the workings. <br />Figures 1 and 2, below, show a pink polygon bounded by the projected 7800' contour, proposed <br />limit of the mine workings, and western edge of the fault line. Figure 2 is drawn at a larger <br />scale; the aerial image base map shows what appear to be tracks or roads crossing the polygon, <br />suggesting that vehicle access may be possible. Has BRL considered sites at this general <br />location? Please provide additional information to demonstrate that the proposed location of <br />the point of compliance wells are sufficiently hydrologically connected to the western <br />workings such that they would monitor water directly affected by the western workings, or <br />propose a new location for the monitoring wells that would allow for monitoring water <br />directly affected by the western workings. <br />BRL - The down gradient wells were relocated so they are west of the fault and away <br />from the projected angle of draw. <br />61. BRL submitted a revised table of contents to incorporate new Volume 1116, and made <br />subsequent edits as a result of the Division's second adequacy review, so that only revised page <br />vi is to be considered under 1311-14. BRL provided a revised page vi listing Exhibits 11 -23, with <br />