My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-31_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-07-31_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:46:14 PM
Creation date
9/17/2014 10:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/31/2014
Doc Name
7/15/2014 Stability Evaluation Report HBET
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume XI Coal Mine Waste Disposal Area No.3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\I HuJJlrstnn•Bcrrs <br />In order to evaluate the impacts of changes in the piezometric surface on the <br />stability, HBET conducted sensitivity analyses. HBET increased the elevation of the <br />piezometric surface by 15 feet and 30 feet at BG06 -06. At BG06 -02, the piezometric <br />surface was increased to the ground surface elevation. The results of the sensitivity <br />analyses indicate that a piezometric surface elevation increase of 15 feet at the location of <br />BG06 -06 will not reduce the factor -of- safety below 1.5. However an increase in the <br />piezometric surface elevation of 30 feet at the location of B006 -06 will reduce the factor - <br />of- safety below I.S. The results of the sensitivity analyses are included in Appendix C. <br />With regard to sensitivity of the shear strength of the gob, as discussed <br />previously, HBET believes that the drained friction angle of 30° used in the analyses is <br />conservative. HBET does not believe that a friction angle of less than 30° will be <br />appropriate for the gob material. Therefore, sensitivity analyses using friction angles of <br />less than 30° were not completed for gob pile #3. <br />4.6 Conclusions <br />As discussed previously, the analyses indicated that the proposed gob pile #3 will <br />be stable. However, changes in pore water pressures may impact the stability of the gob <br />pile over time. As a result, it is recommended that vibrating wire piezometers be <br />installed at gob pile #3 to evaluate any increases in pore pressures associated with the gob <br />placement. <br />5.0 GENERAL <br />This conclusions, results, etc. in this report is based upon the information in the <br />referenced documents, current analyses, and on our experience with similar projects. The <br />conclusions are valid only for the subject project. <br />Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC is pleased to be of service to <br />your project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding the <br />contents of this report. <br />Respectfully Submitted: <br />Huddleston - )3err,* Engineering and Testing, LLC <br />390 0 <br />7 <br />:� <br />� /OMA1. <br />Michael A. Berry; -P.E. <br />Vice President of Engineering <br />;0.\2008 ALL PROJECTS,00489 - JE Storer Associates Ine'PW89.0003 Do% ie Mine %200 - Geo`Gob 34tesision 2'00189.0003 R052114 R2 dot 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.