My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-25_REPORT - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2014-07-25_REPORT - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 3:04:07 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 7:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/25/2014
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 10 <br />Overall, PHC predictions appear to be accurate, as <br />illustrated by the following examples. <br />Per the PHC, TSS values in the surface water runoff are <br />expected to increase a few years after mining and then <br />decline. Data for NPDES sites 001 and 002 illustrate this <br />trend. <br />Per the PHC, elevated TDS levels will be detected in base <br />flows derived from backfill aquifers. During 2013, relatively <br />high TDS concentrations were reported for NPDES sites in <br />several gulches: Johnson, No Name, East Pyeatt, and Flume. <br />All four of these sites are downgradient of potential spoil <br />springs from the A Pit and East A Pit. In general, the data <br />reflect the inverse relationship between TDS and flow. <br />Per the PHC, post -mine values of pH in surface water runoff <br />are not expected to be significantly lower or higher than <br />present or pre -mine levels. Field pH values for all sites in <br />2013 were similar to previous data collected. <br />X. Agreement of <br />Per the PHC, Trapper does not anticipate recharge to the <br />observed <br />shallow aquifer systems to be adversely affected by mining <br />hydrologic <br />CDRMS <br />operations. Water levels in wells GC -2, GP -9, and P -8 (used <br />impacts with <br />regulation <br />Comment <br />to monitor the Third White Sandstone) did not ri se or fall <br />PHC projected in <br />2.05.6(3) <br />considerably between 2012 and 2013. Previous analysis has <br />permit <br />indicated good recharge with above average precipitation <br />over the last year. The backfilled aquifers in general show a <br />steady increase in water level. Water levels in Well GD -3 <br />located in spoil material had a sharp decline in 2006 and <br />have since recovered. According to the report, the decline <br />was due to exploration drilling in the area. <br />Per the PHC, constituent concentrations in backfill aquifers, <br />namely TDS and sulfate, are expected to be higher than pre - <br />mining concentrations for an extended period of time after <br />mining. The data for TDS concentrations in wells in backfill <br />aquifers have shown apparent impacts from mining. TDS <br />concentrations in GD 3 and GF -5 are somewhat higher to <br />those of native aquifers in these areas. TDS values for wells <br />GF -7 and GF -11 were higher than the naturally observed <br />concentrations in the 1990s and 2000s, but have begun to <br />decline recent years. These trends have continued in 2013. <br />Sulfate concentrations exhibited similar trends as TDS for <br />wells GF -7 and GF -11. Sulfate concentrations increased in <br />GD -3 and GD -2 in 2011 and 2012 but declined in 2013. <br />TDS /Sulfate levels in these wells should be watched closely <br />in future years. <br />Y. Adequacy of <br />CDRMS <br />groundwater <br />regulation <br />Yes <br />monitoring <br />4.05.13(1) <br />program <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.