My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-25_REPORT - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2014-07-25_REPORT - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 3:04:07 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 7:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/25/2014
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S. Restoration of <br />ground water <br />recharge to <br />approximate pre- <br />mining rate <br />CDRMS <br />regulation <br />4.05.12(3) <br />Comment <br />Each pit disrupts the potentiometric surface of confined <br />aquifers. After reclamation, monitoring data show recovery <br />of the potentiometric surface outside of backfilled pits and <br />partial recovery of potentiometric surface inside backfilled <br />pits. Spoil springs may reduce groundwater recharge by <br />diverting groundwater flow to surface flow. However, <br />Trapper's expected total aggregate spoil spring discharge of <br />less than 1 cfs will be too small to reduce recharge below the <br />approximate pre- mining rate. <br />The Probable Hydrologic Consequences (PHC) section of <br />Trapper's mining and reclamation permit (Section 4.83) <br />discusses the possibility of a high -TDS plume of coal spoil <br />leachate forming in the Third White Sandstone <br />downgradient from the Trapper Mine in Section 29 -T6N- <br />90W. Such a plume would not be expected to form until <br />several years, possibly decades, after the pit is reclaimed in <br />the adjoining Section 32. Compared to pre- mining ground <br />water conditions, such a plume would have elevated <br />dissolved solids, which could possibly impair the use of <br />ground water in the Third White Sandstone. <br />Spoil leachate could also invade the alluvium in Flume <br />Gulch by seeping down into the subsurface from spoil <br />springs flowing on the land surface in the gulch. <br />T. Prevention of <br />adverse impacts <br />CDRMS <br />The Third White Sandstone is monitored in the area of the <br />to ground water <br />regulation <br />Comment <br />possible plume in well GP -9, and the alluvium is monitored <br />systems outside <br />4.05.11 <br />with the Coy well. Monitoring data from both wells indicate <br />the permit area <br />that a plume has not reached these wells. Well GC -2 <br />completed in the 3rd White Sandstone up- gradient of well <br />GP -9 is showing evidence of the predicted plume with <br />elevated TDS levels and Sulfate levels that have increased <br />over time but have since stabilized. However, up- gradient <br />mining /de- watering near well GC -2 may be playing a role in <br />the groundwater at this well. Other wells down - gradient of <br />spoil backfill such as well P -8 completed in the Third White <br />Sandstone and well GD -2 completed in the R aquifer are <br />also showing signs of elevated TDS /Sulfate likely leaching <br />from backfilled spoils. TDS Levels in well P -8 appear to <br />have stabilized after a large increase in around 1995 but are <br />remaining above baseline levels. TDS /Sulfate levels in the <br />alluvial wells have fluctuated significantly over the years but <br />appear to be within natural levels according to the report. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.