Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br /> 2. Is the affected area boundary clearly marked in accordance with Rule 3.1.12(2)? YES NO <br /> 3.1.12 Signs and Markers <br /> . . . . (2)The boundaries of the affected area will be marked by monuments or <br /> other markers that are clearly visible and adequate to delineate such <br /> boundaries. <br /> (a) for 110 Limited Impact Operations and Limited Impact 110 <br /> Designated Operations the permit boundary for the purposes of <br /> this Rule shall be considered the affected area; <br /> (b) for 112 Regular Operations and 112 Designated Mining Operations <br /> the area proposed to be disturbed by mining operations for which a <br /> Financial Warranty and Performance Warranty have been posted <br /> shall be the affected area. <br /> Permit sign on gate below pilot test mine pad-marking second boundary. <br /> 77, <br /> 7, <br /> K�• <br /> 4 <br /> ,w <br /> 1' <br /> M <br /> 3. Is the mine site in final reclamation (a II material extraction and stockpile removal <br /> is complete)? If"YES", please note time limits related to completion of YES NO <br /> reclamation, Rule 3.1.3. <br /> 4. What was the date of last excavation, processing or hauling activity at the mine? 2013 <br /> The American Soda mining projected involves circulation of hot water through wells to extract sodium <br /> minerals. The last time this activity took place on the permitted site was 2004. In 2006 hauling and <br /> excavation occurred as two ponds, used during the test mine phase, were closed out and reclaimed. This <br /> hauling and excavation was related to reclamation and not mining. In the fall of 2013 the lateral leg <br />