My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-11_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-07-11_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:41 PM
Creation date
7/11/2014 2:51:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/11/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Response #1
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR14
Email Name
SLB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Susan Burgmaier -16- July 10, 2014 <br />BRL - Pages 2.05 -118, 2.05 -120 and 2.06 -3 were revised to remove the CHIA reference. <br />56. DRMS - On proposed page 2.05 -118, data from AW -2 has been removed from the <br />baseline water quality summary. Minimum values for several other wells have increased. <br />Also in that table, there appears to be errors in the calculation of some of the average <br />values. Please clarify why the data in the baseline table is subject to change and <br />review the values in the table, updating as necessary. <br />BRL - Operational data (2006) was inadvertently used for AW -2, 4, 5, 6, 11 & 12. The <br />discrepancy for AW -17 must have been a typo. <br />57. DBMS - On proposed page 2.05 -126, a reference to SW -4 was removed from the text, <br />but SW -4 is retained in the table on page 2.05 -128. Please update the table. <br />BRL - SW -4 was noted as inactive in the table on page 2.05 -128. <br />Rule 2.10 - Maps and Plans <br />58. DRMS - The text on proposed page 2.04 -32 states that the location of DH -68 is shown <br />on Map 9, (on Iron Point). DH -68 has been approved by the USFS as a location for a <br />groundwater monitoring point. Although BRL provides a well supported argument that <br />such a well would not be feasible to construct, the location of the approved point is a useful <br />reference. The point does not appear to be marked. Please update Map 9 to show point <br />DH -68. <br />BRL - Map 9 was updated to show DH -68. <br />59. DRMS - Proposed Maps 9 and 10B show different locations for groundwater monitoring <br />point TC- 03 -02. Please verify the correct location and update the maps accordingly. <br />BRL - Monitoring point TC -03 -02 is shown correctly on both maps. The light use road <br />shown on Map 9 was copied into Map 1013 so the location of the monitoring point should <br />look okay. <br />60. DRMS - Proposed Maps 10A and 10B appear to show conflicting information as to the <br />underground workings. Also the drill hole layer shown on Map 10B is omitted from <br />Map 10A. Please verify the workings and drill hole information and update the <br />two Maps accordingly, (alternatively, BRL may wish to project all three sets of <br />potentiometric surface contours on a single sheet). <br />BRL - The Maps were updated as requested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.