My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-06-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-06-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:01 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 9:20:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/25/2014
Doc Name
Comment on MWNW
From
Dr. Corley
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
DIH
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rINME1 <br />STATE OF <br />js k ICOLORADO�� <br />State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: EFCI MWNW <br />Please add this to laserfiche. <br />Southfield <br />Enforcement and General Docs <br />to DRMS from Dr. Corley <br />Comment on MWNW <br />6/25/14 <br />---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- <br />From: Berry - DNR, David <da\Ad.berry@state.co.us> <br />Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:37 AM <br />Subject: Re: EFCI MWNW <br />To: "W D Corley, Jr." <ajjc att.net> <br />Dr. Corley - Thank you for your message. <br />David <br />On Wednesday, June 25, 2014, W D Corley, Jr. <ajjc att.net> wrote: <br />David Berry, <br />The Corley Company has the largest acreage of all of the landowners affected by the Southfield Mine. In the <br />past we have talked and communicated with your Division about the MWNW monitoring well, and we would <br />like to clarify our position on this issue. We have carefully studied the implications of the MWNW current <br />status. We believo that the two water injection tests sufficiently demonstrate that this well will provide <br />sufficient monitoring capability for the presence or absence of water in the mine void. The basis for that <br />statement is that the approximate twenty feet of the partial obstruction above the mine floor is probably <br />insignificant when compared with over a thousand feet of mine floor elevation difference from the deepest to the <br />highest part of the mine. We want to stress that point because the mine void pitches and is not close to being <br />in a horizontal plane. In addition it is completely unknown how the many mine and panel seals will affect water <br />levels in different parts of the mine. We want to go on record to suggest that EFCI be allowed to monitor the <br />MWNW at the point above the obstruction. <br />Doug Corley, Pres. <br />The Corley Company <br />https: / /mail.g oog le.conVmai I /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &\iev�-- pt &search =i nbox&th= 146f972ee2948b94 &si ml= 146f972ee2948b94 1 /1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.