My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-07_REVISION - M1980110
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980110
>
2014-07-07_REVISION - M1980110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:47:21 PM
Creation date
7/8/2014 6:47:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980110
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/7/2014
Doc Name
Responses
From
E470 Public Highway Authority
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HISTORY COLORADO - <br /> NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES <br /> From: McMahon,Todd <br /> To: Neil Thomson <br /> Cc: Dan Corson-HC <br /> Subject: Re: Notice of 112 Permit Amendment <br /> Date: Thursday,May 29,2014 1:44:18 PM <br /> Thank you Neil for contacting us for clarification. <br /> We checked our files and the Gummersall House (5AM1237) was last evaluated in <br /> 1998 as Officially Not Eligible to the State Register. It is not listed on the National <br /> Register nor the State Register of Historic Places. <br /> Indeed you are correct at this point, our major concern is the inadvertent discovery <br /> of human remains on the property. <br /> Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions. <br /> Gratefully, <br /> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Neil Thomson <NThomsonCd)e-470.com> wrote: <br /> Mr. McMahon: <br /> Tyler O'Donnell with the State Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety sent me <br /> your April 18 letter re the above (attached). I'd like to clarify your letter if I may. <br /> The E-470 Public Highway Authority is the current owner of the Gummersall <br /> property referenced in your letter. Am I correct in assuming that this house is not <br /> on the National Register and therefore not significant? <br /> The house has not been occupied for over 10 years and has been subject to <br /> vandalism and break-ins in recent years. It is a source of some concern to us as <br /> owners because of the need for continued security. Because of this liability and the <br /> fact we have no future use for the house, we are planning to demolish the house <br /> within the next year or so. <br /> It appears that your only concern is if we discover any human remains during our <br /> reclamation activities. <br /> Please let me know if I am correct in my interpretation of your letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.