My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-03_ENFORCEMENT - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-07-03_ENFORCEMENT - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:45:25 PM
Creation date
7/3/2014 1:57:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/3/2014
Doc Name
Hearing/NOV Abatement
From
DRMS
To
Linda Saunders,
Violation No.
CV2013002
Email Name
DAB
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7/3/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail -Re: Hearing Request byVento Group - Southfield Mine <br />Berry - DNR, David <david.berry @state.co.us> Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:35 AM <br />To: Linda Saunders <saunders615 @live.com> <br />Cc: Daniel Hernandez - DNR <daniel.hernandez @state.co.us >, Rob Zuber - DNR <rob.zuber @state.co.us >, Alysha <br />Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez @state.co.us >, Jeff Fugate <jeff.fugate @state.co.us >, David Berry <br /><da\Ad.berry@state.co.us> <br />Hi Linda - Thank you for the message. <br />As part of the response to your question, I attach the DRMS letter disagreeing with the EFCI position that the <br />MWNW remains properly functional. The NOV remains open, and the compliance is deadline will be continued to <br />November. <br />Although it does appear that water can still pass through the casing, we do not believe that water will rise in the <br />casing, even if the mine fills someday. Our letter (attached - scroll down below the initial email message) <br />explains our position in detail. <br />will await word from the others before we continue the hearing unless you feel that we can do that without their <br />agreement. <br />Thank you again, <br />David <br />C <br />)n Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Linda Saunders <saunders615 @li .com> wrote: <br />I would be happy to postpone it to August or September. We need the response <br />from EFCI and a review of it. Thank you for keeping this on the Board Schedule <br />for a later meeting. I think Tena is out of town for the Fourth of July. <br />Would you please explain to me from your engineering background how sending <br />water into the coal workings would confirm that the PVC pipe would provide <br />suction to draw water up it if there is water there. <br />Thank you. <br />Linda <br />Rich - Thank you for the response. <br />Linda, Tena, Paula and Ted - Given the current status of the NOV, and the pending discussions between EFCI <br />https: / /mai l.g oog le.conVmai 1 /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &�iev�-- pt &search =i nbox&th= 146fd4c36bcb9973 &si ml= 146fd4c36bcb9973 1/3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.