2014-06-18_HYDROLOGY - M2001051

• Permit No: M2001051
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 6/18/2014
• Doc Name: SWSP
• From: DWR
• To: Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc.
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Email Name: ECS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Table 5-Revised 611112014
Martin Marietta Materials
Upper Poudre Combined Sites
2014 Water Balance
Lagged Depletions Replacements
Return Flow
North Taft Hill Lagged Home Office Lagged Overland Ponds Lagged Total Lagged- Taylor and Gill Net Impact to
.
DeRequirement for
pletions Depletions Depletions Depletions Deliveries Sent Poudre River
,'Ac W efion,Cr6dit Deliveries Sent
Directly to River
Directly to River
Month (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) r' et (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 66- -feet)
(acre
(B) (A) (C) (D) (F) (G)
Jan-14 -0.13 -1.39 -233 -3.95 0.00 L88 2.96
Feb-14 -0.05 -1.11 -1.76 -2.92 0.00 1.55 2.63
Mar-14 -0.31 -145 -1.71 4.47 • 0.00 1.28 .A-28 0.03
Apr-14 -0.77 -3.51 -1.90 -6.18 3.89 2.09 A%80. - 0.83
May-14 -1.22 -5.82 -2.10 -9.14 -3.63, 37.50 2159 1.14
Jun-14 -1.84 -9.42 -2.30 -13 57 -0-.94'- 25.00 9.48 A 5.52,,, 1.01
Jul-14 -2.40 -11.10 -2,49 -16.00 4.73:e 20.50 8.34 -_12J& - 0.89
Aug-14 -2.59 -11.43 -2.63 -16.64 A OA7; 12.00 5.15 J6.,85;
0.68
Sep-14 -2.31 -9.25 -2.57 -14.14 1,4;82-,, 0.00 0.00 0.68
Oct-14 -1.78 -6.33 --2.44 -10.55 21,36, 0.00 0.04 �,,j­_404- 10.76
Nov-14 -124 4.04 232 -7.60 16.79,__ 0.00 0.74 , A,74 8.45
Dec-14 -0.66 -2.48 -1.98 -5.11 12.42, 0.00 0.51 -9.51, 6.80
Total -15.30 -68.33 -26.53 -110.15 -10177 98.89 54.65 44, 4, 36.86
Notes:
(A)Total lagged depletions calculated in Table 2.
(B)Total lagged depletions calculated in Table 1.
(C)Total lagged depletions calculated in Table 3.
(D)Equals(A)+(B)+(C).
(E)Total recharge credit calculated in Table 4.
(F)Estimated deliveries of Taylor and Gill Ditch water directly to the Cache la Poudre River based on pro-Tata Taylor and Gill historical average farm headgate deliveries.
(G)Return flow requirements associated with Taylor and Gill water being sent directly to the river.Irrigation season return flows are based on a percentage of the monthly delivery while winter return flows are a
percentage of the total delivery in the previous irrigation season.Percentages used to determine return flows can be seen in Column E of Table 4.
(H)Total credit to the river based on deliveries of Taylor and Gill water made directly to the river,Equals(F)-(G).
(1)Equals(D)+(E)+(H).
BBA