Laserfiche WebLink
J. E. Stover & Associates, Inc. <br />September 9, 2011 <br />Page 5 <br />None of the four endangered Colorado River fishes occur in or near the mine permit boundary <br />and the mine permit boundary does not occur within or adjacent to designated critical habitat. <br />The closest potential populations of the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, and razorback <br />sucker are in the Colorado River, more than 15 miles downstream of the mine boundary.4 The <br />bonytail is presumed to be extirpated in Colorado.4 <br />During the, initial permitting process for the mine, the net average consumptive water use was <br />estimated at 356 acre -feet per year.$ Because water depletion in the greater Colorado River <br />basin has the potential to diminish backwater spawning areas in downstream designated critical <br />habitat in the Colorado River, the USFWS produced a "may affect" biological opinion (dated <br />February 7, 1985) with regard to the mine's consumptive water use. To satisfy mitigation <br />measures outlined in the biological opinion, the mine's owner made a required one -time <br />payment to the USFWS in support of endangered fish conservation activities in the Colorado <br />River. <br />Although the mine is no longer active, an approximately 1 -acre sediment pond basin remains <br />within the mine permit boundary. Evaporative water consumption from this basin is estimated at <br />approximately 3 to 4 acre -feet per year. This rate of evaporative consumption could contribute <br />slightly to downstream water depletion in endangered fish critical habitat. In a programmatic <br />biological opinion issued in 1999,9 the USFWS determined that the Upper Colorado River <br />Endangered Fish Recovery Program has made "sufficient progress to be the reasonable and <br />prudent alternative to avoid the likelihood of jeopardy to the endangered fishes and to avoid <br />destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat by depletions of 100 acre -feet or less. <br />Summary of Findings <br />Based on an analysis of habitat requirements and documented species ranges (see Table 1), <br />the renewal of Coal Ridge No. 1 Mine Permit No. C- 1984 -065 will have no effect on Mexican <br />spotted owl, yellow - billed cuckoo, greenback cutthroat trout, Canada lynx, river otter, wolverine, <br />Colorado hookless cactus, DeBeque phacelia, Parachute beardtongue, or Ute ladies'- tresses. <br />Based on a minor amount of water consumption expected to occur at the mine site due to the <br />presence of the remaining sediment pond, the proposed renewal of the mine permit may affect <br />designated critical habitat for bonytail, humpback chub, razorback sucker, and Colorado <br />pikeminnow. As explained above, a formal consultation with the USFWS was conducted in 1984 <br />to address effects of water depletions to Upper Colorado endangered fishes during the initial <br />permitting process for the mine. As a result of the consultation, a one -time required payment <br />was made to USFWS to fund endangered fish conservation activities. The current water <br />depletion expected under the permit revision (approximately 3 to 4 acre -feet per year) will not <br />exceed the originally permitted quantity, and furthermore will not exceed 100 acre -feet per year <br />threshold identified in the USFWS' programmatic biological opinion.9 <br />8 USFWS. 1985. Biological Opinion, Storm King Mines' Coal Ridge No. 1 Mine. File SE/SLC: 6- 5 -85 -F -007. <br />9 USFWS. 1999. Final Programmatic Biological Opinion for Bureau of Reclamation's Operations and Depletions, Other Depletions, <br />and Funding and Implementation of Recovery Program Actions in the Upper Colorado River above the Confluence with the <br />Gunnison River. December. Available at http : / /www.coloradodverrecovery.org /documents - publications /section -7- <br />consultation/15mile /FinaIPBO. pdf. <br />RARE EARTh SCIENCE <br />