2014-06-17_HYDROLOGY - M1977572

• Permit No: M1977572
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 6/17/2014
• Doc Name: SWSP
• From: DWR
• To: Helton & Williamsen
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Email Name: AME
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Row explanations-
1 Average monthly diversions(1980-2012)by Fort Sent Ditch.Excludes Project water.
2 Proration of diversions for 386 shares out of 11.651 2 shares outstanding.Row 1 x(386/11651.2)
3 Proration of diversions for 923 shares out of 11,651.2 shares outstanding.Row 1 x(923/11651.2)
4 Proration of diversions for 1,890.6 shares out of 11,651.2 shares outstanding.Row 1 x(1890.6111651.2)
5 Row 2+Row 3+Row 4.
6 Historical return now obligations on 923 shares(Case No.02CW181)and 1890.6 shares(Case No 05CW107-A pending)after deduction for ditch loss:
April-July:Row 3 x 0.881 x 3121923+Row 4 x 0.881 x 431.6/1890.6
August:Row 3 x 0.881 x 312/923+Row 4 x 0.881 x 495.611890.6
September.Row 3 x 0.881 x 3121923+Row 4 x 0.881 x 697.6/1890.6
October:Row 3 x 0.881 x 312/923+Row 4 x 0.881 x 962 6/1890.6
November-March:(Row 3+Row 4)X0.881 where ditch kiss=11 9%(HI model factor)and 1-0 119=0.881
7 Projection of amounts pumped from Fort Bent Ditch to bap fields(5.9 acres).
8 Project water delivered below John Martin Dam for the Fort Bent Ditch.
9 Transit loss from John Martin Reservoir to Fort Sent Ditch is estimated to be 5%of the amount released Row 8 x 0 05
10 (Row 8-Row 9)x 0.119.
11 Row 2 x(1-0.119)
12 (Row 3+Row 4)x(1-0119)-Row 6-Raw 7.
13 Row 8-Row 9-Row 10.
14 (Row 11+Row 12+Row 13)x(1-0.08).The evaporation loss on the recharge site was estimated to average 8%of the delivery
15 Projected UU pumping inclusive of Rows 16,17,18&19.
16 Lasser of Row 11 x(1-0.08)or Row 15.
17 Projected pumping by pre-1986 wells under Rule 14 Plan.
18 Projected pumping by Well No.47 per substitute water supply plan
19 Projected pumping by floating pump for irrigation of golf course and Fairmount Cemetery(51.2 acres)per substitute supply plan.
20 Row 14-Row 15.Negative(-)values indicate that pumping was greater than recharge and postbve values indicate that recharge was greater than pumping.
21 Projected pumping by Golf Course Well No 31 Backup per substitute supply plan.
22 Projected delivery to Fairmount Cemetery.
23 Projected delivery to Golf Course.
24 Projected pumping by Well No.31,ID No.6705388.a pre-1985 Dakota/Cheyenne bedrock aquifer well.
25 Row 20 amounts logged to Arkansas River and combined with lagged amounts from previous years.SDF=5825 days.
26 Depletions caused by previous years'pumping of structures that are now Included in LAWMA's plan for augmentation Case No.02CW181.
27 Row 21 amounts lagged to Arkansas River and combined with lagged amounts from previous years.Cheyenne aquifer and Glover parameters
28 Row 25+Row 26+Row 27.
29 For the April-November,and March Periods-Minimum of 1)Row 15,or 2)average of Row 15 winter months(December 2013-February 2014). For the December-February period:Row 15.
30 Row 15-Row 29.
31 Row 29 x(Row 17+Row 18)/Row 15.(Rule 14&Well 47 proportionate In-Building use.)
32 Row 31 x 86/3.487.(86 of 3,487 customer accounts are non-severed(i.e.,septic systems).)
33 Row 17+Row 18-Row 31
34 90%x Row 32+13%x Row 33. (2%of irrigation use becomes surface runoff in the same month of application.)
35 Row 34 amounts lagged to Arkansas River and combined with lagged amounts from previous years,plus 2%or Row 33(surface runoff from lawn irrigation).SDF=429 days.
36 (Row 21+Row 22+Row 23-Row 24)x 15%
37 Row 36 is distributed to got course and to cemetery based on deliveries to each.Return flows from got course occur in same month as delivery
Cemetery return flow amounts are lagged to Willow Creek.Willow Creek Aquifer and Glover parameters.
38 Row 7 x 15%.
39 Row 38 lagged to Widow Creek.Willow Creek Aquifer and Glover parameters
40 Projected metered sewage Influent to wastewater treatment lagoons.
41 Projected metered use of Well ID No 6705272 for non-consumptive coal washing at Lamar Power Plant and discharge to sewer
42 Minimum of 1)Row 40-Row 41,or 2)95%x(Row 29-Row 32) (Limited to 95%of the net severed In-Budding use)
43 Evaporation and evapotranspiration from lagoons (63.7 acres water surface and 32.4 acres phreatophytes)
44 (Row 42+Row 43)x(Row 17+Row 18)/(Row 16+Row 17+Row 18).
45 Row 9 x 90%.
46 Row 10 x 90%lagged to Arkansas River and combined with lagged amounts from previous years Lagging based on factors from HI model
47 Row 45+Row 46.
48 Row 28+Row 35+Row 37+Row 39+Row 44+Row 47.Negative(-)values indicate depletion to river/Positive values Indicate accretion to river
49 Accretions utilized for Lamar North Gateway Park Pond Nos.1,2&3 Substitute Supply Plan.
50 Row 48-Row 49. Negative(-)values indicate depletion to river/Positive values indicate accretion to river
Halton&Williamson,P C W U.1001•LamarWlaelmenh 5-Clay Creek Pumping,Table 9 4124/2014