2014-06-11_INSPECTION - M2000151

• Permit No: M2000151
• IBM Index Class Name: INSPECTION
• Doc Date: 6/11/2014
• Doc Name: Inspection report
• From: DRMS
• To: Fremont Paving & Redi-Mix, Inc.
• Inspection Date: 5/20/2014
• Email Name: TC1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

woF coco� COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
�e 90 MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
#.* PHONE: [phone]
±/876
The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has conducted an inspection of the mining operation
noted below. This report documents observations concerning compliance with the terms of the permit
and applicable rules and regulations of the Mined Land Reclamation Board.
MINE NAME:
MINE /PROSPECTING ID #:
MINERAL:
COUNTY:
McCumber Hill Pit
M- 2000 -151
Sand and gravel
Fremont
INSPECTION TYPE:
INSPECTOR(S):
INSP. DATE:
INSP. TIME:
Surety- Related Inspection
Timothy A. Cazier
May 20, 2014
12:33
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE:
TYPE OF OPERATION:
Fremont Paving & Redi -Mix, Inc.
Jordan Sasser & John Young
112c - Construction Regular Operation
REASON FOR INSPECTION:
BOND CALCULATION TYPE:
BOND AMOUNT:
Surety Related
Partial Bond
$64,540.00
DATE OF COMPLAINT:
POST INSP. CONTACTS:
JOINT INSP. AGENCY:
NA
None
None
WEATHER:
INSP 'S GNATURE:
SIGNATURE DATE:
Clear
I
I June 11, 2014
The following inspection topics were identifie as having Problems or Possible Violations. OPERATORS
SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING PAGES CAREFULLY IN ORDER TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT AND APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. If a
Possible Violation is indicated, you will be notified under separate cover as to when the Mined Land
Reclamation Board will consider possible enforcement action.
INSPECTION TOPIC: Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan
PROBLEM /POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: Neither the 25 -foot setback nor the 3:1 excavated slopes are being
practiced along the east boundary as required by the approved permit.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall submit a Technical Revision, with the required $216 revision fee, to
revise the approved mining and reclamation plans and Exhibit S, such that an alternative, acceptable and stable
configuration can be demonstrated by August 11, 2014; OR backfill the east highwall to achieve the required
25 -foot setback and 3:1 slope by September 30, 2014. Approved backfill and stabilization activities shall be
completed by September 30, 2014. Documentation of the completed repairs shall be submitted to the Division
by October 7, 2014.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/11/14
INSPECTION TOPIC: Revegetation
PROBLEM /POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: Tamarisk (salt cedar) trees are present within or have volunteered
into the permit area and are becoming established. This is a problem for failure to employ weed control
methods for a state listed noxious weed species within the permitted area, and to reduce the spread of weeds
to nearby areas as required by Section 3.1.10 (6) of the Rule.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall develop a weed control and management plan in accordance with
Section 3.1.10 (6) of the Rule. This plan should be developed in consultation with the county extension agency,
or weed control district office and should include specific control measures to be applied, a schedule for when
control measures will be applied and a post- treatment monitoring plan. The plan should also consider the field
bindweed (List Q. This weed control plan shall be submitted to the Division as a Technical Revision to the
approved plan with the appropriate Technical Revision fee of $216.00 by the corrective action date.
CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/11/14
Pagel of 8