My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-06-04_HYDROLOGY - M1983176
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1983176
>
2014-06-04_HYDROLOGY - M1983176
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2020 12:11:59 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 1:44:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983176
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/4/2014
Doc Name
Monitoring Well Measurments for Speer Site
From
Asphalt Specialties
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
TOD
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tor) Oil 1 23 17-6 <br /> STATE OF <br /> COLORADO <br /> Fwd: MONITORING WELL MEASURMENTS FOR SPEER SITE <br /> Kaldenbach - DNR, Tom <tom.kaldenbach@state.co.us> Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:30 PM <br /> To: Tyler O'Donnell - DNR<tyler.odonnelI@state.co.us> <br /> ----- Forwarded message -------- <br /> From: Rob Laird <RobL@asphaltspecialties.com> <br /> Date: Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:08 PM <br /> Subject: MONITORING WELL MEASURMENTS FOR SPEER SITE <br /> To: "tom.kaldenbach@state.co.us" <tom.kaldenbach@state.co.us> <br /> Tom: <br /> Please note the attached and print out. The pages go from newest to oldest. There are also notes all over the <br /> place near the measurements as to what was/is happening. If I have been remiss in attaching well measurements <br /> to my annual reports to the DRMS, I am sorry. Please excuse the lack of the data in the last few years' reports. <br /> Please note the following: <br /> 1. The requirement for well measurements at this site was initially and only for dry mining. That had to do with <br /> offsite impacts. These wells (and some got mined thru)were only upgradient from the dry mining. <br /> 2. 1 do not remember why we added well #9 (further north on Brighton Rd.) but that may have been in say -2005 <br /> due to adding on the Seeger property and mining thru two others that were along his old property line that was <br /> then the farthest east of dry mining on the Speer property. Yes, that is why. <br /> 3. Wells #10 and #11 were only drilled on the riverside recently for water sampling for the inert fill permit. <br /> 4. Any recent water level measurements are either only due to the sampling program for CDPHE or due to the <br /> high groundwater issue we "caused" beginning in 2009 due to mounding upgradient of some fill we put in on the <br /> Brighton Rd. side. <br /> 5. 1 came to work for this company in 2001. What I term the "normal"water elevations in wells #3 and #9 are <br /> not really normal at all, it is just what I was used to with all measuring up until we shut the pumps off from dry <br /> mining. Those elevations were artificially depressed due to the dry mining. Normal (pre-dry mining in the entire <br /> area)water elevations are generally what are occurring now. <br /> 6. Please forward this info to Tyler if he is interested. I also have well measurements dating back to -2000, but <br /> many of those wells are gone. Only#3 remains from that "era". <br /> I have gone over and over all this data for what, 5 years? I have piles of it. It just won't go away! I believe Mike R. <br /> has deepened somewhat the trench downside of the culvert for the lake outlet. You might call Levi Kirby say <br /> tomorrow and ask him if his pump is no longer cycling on. It only takes a foot or two of reducing the water table <br /> for everything to be OK. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.