Laserfiche WebLink
each reference area individually, the reclaimed area would thus pass the weighted herbaceous <br />production performance standard. <br />A two- sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the assertion that the <br />2012 BRB -5 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Mountain Brush Reference Area <br />allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />xbr — 0.9xre f <br />tcatc = }}__ <br />Sbr + (0.9 s SrefJ <br />n "ref <br />tGaiG_ 476.1- (0.9 * 214.5) = 7.608 <br />— <br />808740.49 (0.81 * 19516.09) <br />35 + 31 <br />dfaat = SEsat <br />SEbr + (0.9 * SE,.ef�` <br />nbr - I nref - 1 <br />Sbr z <br />inhere: SEsat = J;I-b + (0.9 * Srsf <br />r 21rsf <br />808740.49 t (0.81 * 19516.09)1 ; <br />dfsat = 35 31 = Or' 2$ <br />X61.52+ (0.9 * 25.09)4 <br />k27.85 <br />35 -1 31 -1 <br />Since critical tc = 0.855 (one - tailed, alpha = 0.2, 28 dfsat) and t�,c (7.608) is greater than this critical value, <br />the hypothesis of no difference is rejected and reclamation success for Phase III herbaceous production <br />relative to the 2012 Mountain Brush Reference area is demonstrated. <br />A two- sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the assertion that the <br />2012 BRB -5 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Sagebrush Reference Area <br />allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />27 <br />