My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:44:14 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 1:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/28/2014
Doc Name
Answers to Questions Regarding What water standards are required for mines
From
DRMS
To
Linda Saunders, AGS, EFCI, Vento Family
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
RDZ
JHB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/29/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail -Re: What water standards are required for mines <br />Berry - DNR, David <david.berry @state.co.us> Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:41 PM <br />To: Linda Saunders <saunders615 @live.com> <br />Cc: Tena Gallagher <tena @aol.com >, Jeff Fugate <jeff.fugate @state.co.us >, Ted Coulter <tedcoulter @yahoo.com >, <br />Paula Coulter <pauIacoulter @com cast. net >, Rich Munson <rich @ramunson.com >, George Patterson <br /><efcoal @gmail.com >, Daniel Hernandez - DNR <daniel.hernandez @state.co.us >, Rob Zuber- DNR <br /><rob.zuber @state.co.us >, Alysha Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez @state.co.us> <br />Hi Linda - <br />The DRMS has previously expressed the regulatory standards, as indicated in Boulay's memo. He also <br />confirmed with me that he spent significant time on the phone with you explaining all of the issues and our <br />position. It seems that the previous answers are either not understood or not accepted. We are willing to again <br />explain the DRMS position, but Boulay is best able to do that and he is not available until next week. <br />In the meantime, I firmly believe that EFCI needs to be in this discussion, and we need to hear from them as to <br />their position, thus my inquiry to them. <br />In the end, there seems to be some underlying conflict that exists between the Vento group and EFCI that <br />remains unresolved. DRMS has been responding in good faith to your inquiries, most of which seem to reiterate <br />the same questions. We will continue to do our best to provide information, but messages such as your note <br />below are not helpful. <br />You have requested a MLRB hearing which is very rigorous process, and which may or may not provide the <br />result you are wanting. The MLRB will likely want to know if the EFCI and Vento representatives have engaged in <br />any direct attempts to resolve the issues. To this end, we are trying to facilitate such a process. <br />It is our sincere intent and hope that meetings inwlving both Vento reps such as yourself along with EFCI folks <br />will begin to move the situation in a positive direction. <br />In my opinion, the collective resources of the Vento representatives, EFCI, and if we can help, the DRMS are <br />best utilized in direct talks between your folks and EFCI. This is why we are meeting, and I am there as the head <br />of the DRMS Coal Program to facilitate a resolution. I have also expressed the same position to EFCI. <br />My staff and I have worked extensively to address your issues, and we will continue to do so. Just as we respect <br />your input and inquiries, I ask that you extend the same level of respect in our direction. <br />look forward to joining you and EFCI representatives by telephone tomorrow. <br />David Berry <br />On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Linda Saunders <saunders615 @1i .com> wrote: <br />Does the Division not know what water standards apply to mining ?? <br />And without the critical staff available at the conference call and meeting, who are we meeting with and why ?? <br />Linda <br />Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:48:40 -0600 <br />https: / /mai l.g oog le.conVmai 1 /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &view= pt &search =i nbox&th= 14644c78852ca42f &si ml= 14644c78852ca42f 1/2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.