Laserfiche WebLink
List of Tables <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -1 Water Quality Comparison — Overburden Water 22 <br />(GW -N9) vs. Spoil Water (Spoil Spring) <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2 NHN Backfill Spring Predicted Impact 30 <br />on Receiving Streams <br />List of Figures <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -1 North -South Section Showing Drainage In Backfill 17 <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -1 <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -la BBA Water Consultant Report <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -lb WRS, LLC Report on Augmentation Plan <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -lc Approved Water Augmentation Plan <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -2 <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />Summary of Hydrologic Consequences <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />Flow Rates vs. TDS <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />GW -N8 Hydrograph <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />GW -N9 Hydrograph <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2c <br />Projected Draw Down <br />Hydrograph Modeling Procedures and Assumptions <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2d MODFLOW Overburden Water Level <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2e MODFLOW Draw Down <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2f Monitoring Well Water Levels <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2g Distance /Drawdown Summary <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -3 <br />NHN Mine Hydrologic Monitoring Plan <br />October 2013 (TR -05) <br />E: \New Horizon \DRMS \NHN Permit\04_Techmcal Revisions TR \TR -05 \Documents from Jason \2.05.6(3) TOC Protection of Hydrologic Balance_TR- 05.docx <br />