Laserfiche WebLink
Ground water monitoring well GW -N9 (see Map 2.04.7 -1) was installed by Peabody and <br />quarterly analyses were conducted from October 1979 to October 1987. This monitoring well is <br />located within the NHN permit area and is open to both the Overburden and Coal zones. The <br />quality data for this well is reported in the New Horizon 1 Mine Area permit pages 7 -4 -49 to 7 -4- <br />53. The average TDS for the period was 3785 mg/l and the average SO4 concentration was 2423 <br />mg/1. The values of these two parameters are significantly higher than the Coal Zone values at <br />GW -N48 and GW -N51. This indicates that water quality in the Coal Zone (and probably the OB <br />Zone) is also dependent on depth or isolation beneath the weathered zone as well as distance <br />from the recharge area. Therefore, water quality is expected to deteriorate in the down dip <br />direction as well as toward areas with higher overburden thickness. The thickest overburden in <br />the NHN permit area is in the southern one third of the area (see Map 2.04.6 -3). <br />Underburden Zone Ground Water Ouality The quarterly Underburden Zone ground water <br />sample analyses from wells GW -N47, GW -N50 and GW -N53 are contained in Appendix 2.04.7- <br />1 along with the hydrographs and water level data. These three wells have been monitored and <br />samples collected since October 10, 2008. Review of TDS and SO4 from the three wells show <br />that wells GW -N47 and GW -N50 (see Map 2.04.7 -1 for well locations) have poorer water <br />quality than the Coal Zone at the two corresponding sites; whereas, the Underburden Zone water <br />quality at well GW -N53 is better than the coal zone quality for that site. The shallow depth of the <br />coal zone at the two wells (GW -N47 and GW -N50) indicates that weathering has removed <br />(oxidized) at least to some degree the higher sulfur content that is to be expected in the coal <br />zone. The poorest water quality of the three new Underburden Zone wells is at GW -N47 located <br />in the northeast corner of the NHN permit area. This condition differs significantly from the <br />overburden and coal zones where the poorest quality water was at the southwestern site or at <br />wells GW -N54 and GW -N55. This suggests that the area of primary recharge for the <br />underburden in the northwest corner of the NHN Permit area may be other than the 2 "d Park <br />Lateral. Table 2.04.7 -3 summarizes the ground water quality from the analyses of the samples <br />from the three underburden monitoring wells. The WQCC (Regulation 41) water quality <br />standards are also included on this table for comparison with the underburden samples. Sulfate <br />exceeds the drinking water standards at all three wells while iron and manganese exceed drinking <br />water standards at wells GW -N47 and GW -N50. <br />Springs and Seeps <br />Three springs were defined in and in close proximity to the southern part of the NHN permit area <br />by Peabody at the old Nucla Mine (see Map 2.04.7 -1). Two of these springs were at the toe of <br />the old backfill area while the third was a spring issuing from the high -wall of the Nucla Mine <br />after mining ceased in 1983. These three "springs" were monitored from 1983 through 1987. The <br />water quality and flow data for spoil springs SS #1, SS #2 and SS #3 are contained in the <br />Appendix of Section 2.04.7 -2. Spoil Spring (SS) #1 is located along a reclaimed drainage at the <br />toe of the backfill of the old Nucla Mine. SS #2 was located about 50 yds up- stream and to the <br />west of SS #1. The high -wall spring issued from the base of the overburden zone at or very near <br />to the contact with the coal zone. The flow of all three of these springs appeared to vary with the <br />seasonal irrigation (see New Horizon 1 Mine Area permit). Flow rate varied from a 16.6 gpm to <br />about 47 gpm during the irrigation season at SS #1 to a rate of 16.6 gpm to 32 gpm during non- <br />irrigation periods. SS #3 had a much lower flow rate estimated at about 0.3 gpm during the fall <br />of 1986. The only quantifiable flow rates from the high -wall (SS #3) were during the irrigation <br />Section 2.04.7 Page 10 October 2013 (TR -05) <br />E: \New Horizon \DRMS \NHN Permit \04_Techmcal Revisions TR \TR -05 \Documents from Jason \2.04.7 Hydrology Description_TR- 05.dou <br />