Laserfiche WebLink
5/20/2014 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Questions and Responses - EFCI <br />STATE of <br />COLORADO <br />Questions and Responses - EFCI <br />Rich A. Munson <rich @ramunson.com> Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:34 PM <br />To: "Berry - DNR, David" <david.berry@state.co.us> <br />Cc: Linda Saunders <saunders615 @live.com >, Paula Coulter <pauIacoulter @com cast. net >, Ted Coulter <br /><tedcoulter @yahoo.com >, Tena Gallagher <tena @aol.com >, George Patterson <efcoal @gmail.com >, Alysha <br />Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez @state.co.us >, Daniel Hernandez - DNR <daniel.hernandez @state.co.us >, Rob <br />Zuber - DNR <rob.zuber @state.co.us >, Jeff Fugate <jeff.fugate @state.co.us >, "rosieboast @msn.com" <br /><rosieboast @msn.com> <br />Folks: the response of Energy Fuels is attached along with a copy of the Lease and Settlement Agreement requested <br />by Mr. Berry. <br />Regards, Rich Munson <br />From: "< Berry- DNR > ", David Berry <david.berry@state.co.us> <br />Date: Friday, May 16, 201411:16 AM <br />To: "Richard A. Munson" <rich@ramunson.com> <br />Cc: Linda Saunders <Saunders615@live.com >, Paula Coulter <paulacoulter@comcast.net >, Ted Coulter <br /><tedcoulter@yahoo.com >, Bertina Gallagher <Tena@aol.com >, George Patterson <efcoal@gmad.com >, <br />Alysha Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez@state.co.us >, Daniel Hernandez - DNR <br /><daniel.hernandez@state.co.us >, Rob Zuber- DNR <rob.zuber@state.co.us >, Jeff Fugate <br /><jeff.fugate@state.co.us >, David Berry <david.berry@state.co.us> <br />Subject: Re: Will not attend the meeting <br />Mr. Munson, Ms. Saunders, Ms. Gallagher, Mr. and Ms. Coulter - Given the of apparent lack of interest and <br />availability of the EFCI and Vento representatives, the previously agreed and scheduled meeting for later today is <br />cancelled. <br />We will expect a written response from EFCI by Monday. Please include the previously referenced 2000 lease and <br />any settlement agreement executed between the parties. <br />Be advised, that both the DRMS and the MLRB expect more effective communication and efforts towards issue <br />identification and resolution than is currently occurring. <br />Mr. Fugate's message and proposed stipulation are still valid, and we need your responses. Note the suggestion that <br />July may be a more realistic hearing date given all of the factors in play. <br />https: / /mai I.g oog le.conVmai 1 /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &viev�-- pt &search =i nbox&th= 14616aO35lf63f25 &si ml= 14616aO35lf63f25 1/3 <br />