|
Tree Physiology 23, 1113 -1124
<br />2003 Heron Publishing — Victoria, Canada
<br />Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: stream flow dependency,
<br />water relations and restoration
<br />STEWART B. ROOD, 1,2 JEFFREY H. BRAATNE3 and FRANCINE M. R. HUGHES
<br />Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, AB TIK 3M4, Canada
<br />Author to whom correspondence should be addressed (rood @uleth.ca)
<br />Department offish and Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 -1136, USA
<br />Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EM U.K.
<br />Received October 17, 2002; accepted March 29, 2003; published online October 1, 2003
<br />Summary Cottonwoods (Populus spp.) are adapted to ripar-
<br />ian or floodplain zones throughout the Northern Hemisphere;
<br />they are also used as parents for fast - growing hybrid poplars.
<br />We review recent ecophysiological studies of the native cotton-
<br />woods Populus angustifolia James, P. balsamifera L., P. delt-
<br />oides Marsh., P. fremontii S. Watson and P. trichocarpa T. & G.
<br />in North America, and P. nigra L. in Europe. Variation exists
<br />within and across species and hybrids; however, all riparian
<br />cottonwoods are dependent on shallow alluvial groundwater
<br />that is linked to stream water, particularly in semi -arid regions.
<br />This conclusion is based on studies of their natural occurrence,
<br />decline following river damming and dewatering (water re-
<br />moval), water relations, isotopic composition of xylem water,
<br />and by the establishment of cottonwoods along formerly bar-
<br />ren natural channels after flow augmentation in response to the
<br />conveyance of irrigation water. When alluvial groundwater is
<br />depleted as a result of river dewatering or groundwater pump-
<br />ing, riparian cottonwoods exhibit drought -stress responses
<br />including stomatal closure and reduced transpiration and pho-
<br />tosynthesis, altered 13C composition, reduced predawn and
<br />midday water potentials, and xylem cavitation. These physio-
<br />logical responses are accompanied by morphological re-
<br />sponses including reduced shoot growth, altered root growth,
<br />branch sacrifice and crown die -back. In severe cases, mortality
<br />occurs. For example, severe dewatering of channels of the
<br />braided Big Lost River in Idaho led to mortality of the narrow -
<br />leaf cottonwood, P. angustifolia, and adjacent sandbar willows,
<br />Salix exigua Nutt., within 5 years, whereas riparian woodlands
<br />thrived along flowing channels nearby. The conservation and
<br />restoration of cottonwoods will rely on the provision of river
<br />flow regimes that satisfy these ecophysiological requirements
<br />for survival, growth and reproduction.
<br />Keywords: Populus.
<br />Introduction
<br />Cottonwoods (Populus spp.) occur in riparian zones (river val-
<br />ley floodplains) throughout the Northern Hemisphere (John-
<br />son 1994, Braame et al. 1996, Naiman and 136camps 1997).
<br />Along with willows ( Salix spp.), cottonwoods are ecological
<br />pioneers that colonize barren riparian sites, and in semi -arid
<br />environments they are the dominant and often exclusive ripar-
<br />ian tree species (Rood and Mahoney 1995, Scott et al. 1997,
<br />Patten 1998). In wetter regions, such as eastern North America
<br />and central Europe, cottonwoods are followed in succession
<br />by other hardwoods, and in the Pacific region of North Amer-
<br />ica and boreal regions of North America and Europe, they are
<br />followed by conifers (Johnson 1994, Polzin and Rood 2000).
<br />Riparian cottonwoods provide stream -bank stabilization
<br />and wildlife habitat, contribute to aquatic ecosystems, and pro-
<br />vide the parental genotypes for natural and artificial inter -
<br />specific hybrids ( Eckenwalder 1996, Stettler et al. 1996). Nat-
<br />ural hybrids are important for ecosystem biodiversity
<br />(Schweitzer et al. 2002, McIntyre and Whitham 2003), and ar-
<br />tificial intersectional hybrids often grow vigorously and
<br />provide fiber, fuel and wood products. However, cottonwood
<br />forests are particularly vulnerable to degradation of riparian
<br />zones as a result of livestock production, tree harvesting for fi-
<br />ber and fuel, and clearing for agriculture, human settlement
<br />and transportation corridors (Rood and Mahoney 1990, Patten
<br />1998, Muller et al. 2002).
<br />River damming and water diversion have further contrib-
<br />uted to the collapse of cottonwood populations along many
<br />rivers (Rood and Mahoney 1990, Braatne et al. 1996). The de-
<br />cline of cottonwoods downstream from dams prompted us to
<br />review the dependency of riparian cottonwoods on stream
<br />flow and the consequences of dewatering (removal of water)
<br />on cottonwood water relations. We focus on studies conducted
<br />after 1990, thereby complementing previous reviews of cot-
<br />tonwood water relations (Blake et al. 1996, Smith et al. 1998),
<br />impacts of damming (Rood and Mahoney 1990, Friedman et
<br />al. 1998, Nilsson and Bergren 2000), and life history and con-
<br />servation ( Braatne et al. 1996, Karrenberg et al. 2002). We
<br />have adopted the taxonomic treatment of Populus described by
<br />Eckenwalder (1996).
<br />t This paper was among those presented at the /7th North American Forest Biology Workshop "Rocky Mountain ecosystems: Diversity, com-
<br />plexity and interactions, " sponsored by the Tree Physiology and Forest Genetics working groups of the Society ofAmerican Foresters and held
<br />at Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
<br />
|