My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-15_REVISION - M1987064
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987064
>
2014-05-15_REVISION - M1987064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:19:09 PM
Creation date
5/15/2014 4:50:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987064
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/15/2014
Doc Name
Response to adequacy review comments TR04
From
Elam Construction, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R.M. Gazal et al. /Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 137 (2006) 56-67 <br />Transpiration by cottonwood forests can be a <br />substantial component of the total water budget of <br />riparian systems (Goodrich et al., 2000). However, there <br />remains considerable uncertainty in estimates of <br />transpiration in these systems because of landscape - <br />scale variation in forest structure and the heterogeneity <br />of groundwater availability (Schaeffer et al., 2000). <br />Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in cottonwood <br />forest transpiration is likely to be substantial, but is <br />poorly documented. Yet heterogeneity in water use of <br />vegetation influences ecosystem water balance and key <br />ecological processes. Water use of cottonwood forests, <br />one of the most dominant riparian vegetation types in <br />the Upper San Pedro Basin in southeastern Arizona, <br />USA, has a great influence on the overall productivity <br />and water balance of the riparian corridor (Goodrich <br />et al., 2000; Scott et al., in press). Within this context, it <br />is important to determine the extent to which cotton- <br />wood trees control hydrological processes and the <br />effects of seasonal variability and temporal trends in <br />water resources on the physiology of cottonwood trees <br />(Gurnell et al., 2000). <br />Plants regulate transpiration (E) to maximize <br />photosynthesis, minimize water loss and avoid <br />drought- induced formation of xylem embolisms (Tyree <br />and Sperry, 1989; Whitehead, 1.998; Sparks and .Black, <br />1999). Plant structural and physiological traits asso- <br />ciated with regulation of transpiration include the <br />amount of leaf and sapwood area (Gholz, 1982; White <br />et al., 1998; Whitehead, 1998; Cinnirella et al., 2002; <br />Schaeffer et al., 2000) and stomatal characteristics and <br />responsiveness to atmospheric moisture (Oren et al., <br />1999; Medrano et al., 2002; Vose et al., 2003). The <br />hydraulic connection between the roots and the water <br />table also influences transpiration (Cooper et al., 2003), <br />particularly in riparian forests that are sustained by <br />shallow groundwater tables (Tyree et al., 1994; Zhang <br />et al., 1999; Vose et al., 2003). <br />Plants avoid excessive transpiration during periods <br />of high vapor pressure deficit (D) by regulating stomatal <br />conductance. Cottonwood trees along an ephemeral <br />river system in Arizona were found to be more sensitive <br />to high vapor pressure deficit than other riparian species <br />such as the drought tolerant Tamarix chinensis (Horton <br />et al., 2001 a). Stomatal conductance and net photo- <br />synthesis rate of cottonwood trees decline during <br />drought (Horton et al., 2001 a), which may indicate <br />the influence of soil moisture stress on stomatal opening <br />(Unsworth et al., 2004). Reduction in leaf area, <br />accompanied by physiological changes necessary to <br />counterbalance loss in photosynthetic leaf tissue, <br />provides an effective mechanism that can be used <br />57 <br />with stomatal closure to prevent excessive water loss <br />(Roberts, 2000). <br />In this paper, we present the seasonal patterns of <br />cottonwood transpiration at two contrasting riparian <br />sites in order to better understand how the trees transpire <br />in relation to canopy structure, evaporative demand and <br />groundwater depth. Along the San Pedro River in <br />southeastern Arizona, we quantified cottonwood tran- <br />spiration using sap flow measurements for a cluster of <br />trees located on a perennial section of the river and <br />another located along a reach with intermittent stream <br />flow. Hydrologically, these sites differed in the depth <br />and seasonal fluctuation of the water table. We also <br />computed crop coefficients for cottonwood transpira- <br />tion to understand mechanisms controlling transpiration <br />and to evaluate suitable proxies for cottonwood <br />transpiration in the absence of direct transpiration <br />measurements. <br />2. Methods <br />2.1. Study sites <br />Study sites were located on the floodplain of the San <br />Pedro River in the San Pedro Riparian National <br />Conservation Area (SPRNCA) in southeastern Arizona. <br />A cluster of cottonwood trees was monitored at two <br />sites with contrasting groundwater depth levels <br />(Table 1). The Boquillas site (1180 m elevation, <br />31.6986 °N 110.1808 °W) was located along an inter- <br />mittent reach of the river and the groundwater depth <br />ranged from 3.1 to 3.9 m (mean = 3.3 m) during this <br />study. In contrast, the Lewis Springs site (1250 m <br />elevation, 31.5533 °N, 110.1391 °W) was located along a <br />perennially flowing reach of the San Pedro River and the <br />groundwater depth ranged from 1.1 to 1.8 m <br />(mean = 1.6 m). The climate in the San Pedro Basin <br />is semiarid with large fluctuations in water availability <br />and diurnal and annual air temperature. Approximately <br />350 mm of precipitation falls annually with about 60% <br />of that occurring during the summer monsoon from <br />July— September (Scott ct al., 2004). Cottonwood trees <br />usually leaf out in early April, about one month before <br />the last nocturnal frost of the spring. The pre- monsoon <br />period of May and June is usually very dry (midday <br />D > 5 kPa) and hot (maximum temperature >35 °C). <br />The frequent afternoon thunderstorms and river flood- <br />ing during the annual summer monsoon relieve the <br />intense drought. Cottonwood trees in the river basin <br />become dormant in early November and transpiration <br />typically ends after the first hard frost of autumn <br />(Goodrich et al., 2000). The cottonwood stands along <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.