Laserfiche WebLink
2001 CorrONNVOOD WATER RESPONSE DvRtNc Ditt3t caff <br />high vulnerability to cavitation (Blake et al. <br />1996). On day 245 of the study, T,.jd of study <br />trees averaged -2.0 ti1Fa (Fig. 1); this value <br />corresponds to approximately a 70% loss of <br />hydraulic conductivity in stems due to xylem <br />embolismn according to one P, angtutifolia vul- <br />nerability curve (Tyree et al. 1994), and poten- <br />tially IOM loss in some tissues according to <br />Blake et al, (1996). because we did not assess <br />the origin of the water transpired by trees in <br />our current study, we cannot conclude un- <br />equivocally that they did not take up surface <br />soil moisture. However, since T ..ia values <br />indicate high levels of stem xylem embolism <br />(but see Blake et al. 1996) and since roots are <br />more susceptible to xylem embolism than <br />stems (Sperry and Saliendra 1994, H:acke and <br />Sauter 1996, Sperry and Ikeda 1997), it is <br />probable that xylem dysfunction occurred dur- <br />ing our study period. If significant xylem dys- <br />function did occur in surface roots, and if <br />embolism repair in cavitatod roots was too <br />slow to reestablish function, then this might <br />account for the lack of physiological response <br />in cottonwoods to the irrigation treatment in <br />our study <br />Finally, it is possible that our irrigation <br />treatments, which lasted 3 weeks, may not <br />have been long enough to elicit a physiological <br />response. for instance, Devitt et al. (1991) <br />found a physiological response to surface irri- <br />gation in trees from and environments after 4 <br />weeks. However, given that sporadic pulse <br />precipitation events are common and short - <br />lived in the region J oik et al. 2004), it is unlikely <br />that a 4 -week response time to increased sur- <br />face moisture is ecologically meaningful unless <br />early precipitation events are harbingers of <br />prolonged wet periods. Thus, a Iaek of response <br />within the time frame used in our study may <br />be ecologically equivalent to a lack of response. <br />This lack of responsiveness in cottonwoods <br />to surface water additions may reflect an evo- <br />lutionary constraint on soil water uptake due <br />to a long regional history of low summer precip- <br />itation in northern Utah. For example, lack of <br />significant response to soil moisture may be. a <br />successful carbon allocation strategy of cotton- <br />woods. The tinting of our irrigation treatments <br />corresponded with a period of seasonally dry <br />soils, when infrequent rains only temporarily <br />elevate soil moisture. A long -term evolution- <br />ary response, maximizing carbon allocation and <br />Iimiting unnecessary growth (i.e., easily cavi- <br />110 <br />tated root tissues; Sperry and Saliendra 1994, <br />Backe and Sauter 1996, Sperry and Ike(l, 1997), <br />may be avoidance of embolism repair in such <br />tissues during seasonal drought periods. This <br />level of genetic specificity would not be sur- <br />prising given the extensive documented genetic <br />variation in cottonwood water- stress tolerance, <br />root growth, and water use (Tschapiinski and <br />Blake 1984 IWb, Blake et al. 1996, Pregitxer <br />and Friend 19%, Fischer et al. 2004). When <br />surface soil moisture levels are more consis- <br />tently high, whole -tree response to soil mois- <br />ture increases may be more common. <br />We found a siguifrcant relationship between <br />average daily Et and Tpre, and average daily <br />G and �T' . However, in both cases the rela- <br />tionship was opposite of our hypothesized re- <br />lationship; both El and GG decrease=d rather <br />than increased with increasing IF Me values <br />(14g. 2). This pattern may be partially due to <br />the high transpiration rates of some cotton- <br />wood trees and their poor stomatal regulation <br />(Stettler et al. 1996, Fischer et al. 2004); the <br />relatively high transpiration rates may have led <br />to progressively poor whole-plant water status <br />(as measured by lower ''4 pre values), reflecting <br />that some cottonwood trees seem to operate <br />with a small margin of safety from cavitation <br />events (Blake et al. 1996). Furthermore, these <br />statistically significant negative correlations <br />may be somewhat spurious given that they <br />were fairly weak (r2 = 0.35 and 0.44, respec- <br />tively) and occurred over a fairly narrow range <br />of Tpre values (-0.45 to -0.65 MPa). <br />Our results suggest that, while some species <br />may show strong physiologic responses to pulse <br />increases in soil moisture (Donovan and <br />Ehler finger 1994, Cui and Caldwell 1997; also <br />see Ogle and Reynolds. 2004, Schwinning and <br />Sala 2004), some cottonwood trees may exhibit <br />little immediate physiological response to in- <br />creases in soil moisture from precipitation. <br />events. This lack of response may be related to <br />a water -use strategy associated with regional <br />climate patterns, cavitation recovery, or other <br />physical determinants of water use such as <br />depth to groundwater. Cottonwood riparian <br />forests represent some of the most biologically <br />productive ecosystems in the West, and our <br />data suggest that it is important to consider <br />potential nonresponsiveness to changes in soil <br />water availability when evaluating the impact <br />of climate change on these important and pro- <br />ductive ecosystems. <br />