Laserfiche WebLink
1120 <br />m <br />c <br />0 <br />.Q <br />�U <br />D_ <br />ROOD, BRAATNE AND HUGHES <br />Cool Temperature <br />tonwood growth has led to field trials to improve water condi- <br />tions for cottonwood conservation, the retention of remaining <br />woodlands, and the restoration and reestablishment of wood- <br />lands in degraded riparian zones (Johnson et al. 1995, Poff et <br />al. 1997, Briggs and Cornelius 1998, Mahoney and Rood <br />1998, Springer et al. 1999, Bovee and Scott 2002). <br />Water management strategies involving flow regulation <br />downstream of dams can be of widespread benefit for riparian <br />cottonwoods (Stanford et al. 1996, Poff et al. 1997, Mahoney <br />and Rood 1998, Rood et al. 1998, Richter and Richter 2000, <br />Hughes and Rood 2001, Stromberg 2001). Localized benefits <br />can also be derived from supplemental water through irriga- <br />tion or other treatments (Friedman et al. 1995, Molles et al. <br />1998, Sprenger et al. 2002). Knowledge of cottonwood water <br />relations is also relevant to applications intended to restrict <br />cottonwood expansion, which can also follow river regulation <br />(Johnson 1997, 2000), or to influence competition between <br />cottonwoods and other plants, particularly invasive weeds <br />(Shafroth et al. 1994, Stromberg 1997, Gladwin and Roelle <br />1998, Sher et al. 2002). <br />Several recent studies have demonstrated historic correla- <br />tions between cottonwood status and stream flow. Pulses of <br />cottonwood reproduction have accompanied years with high <br />flow or appropriate flow patterns (Scott et al. 1996, 1997, <br />Mahoney and Rood 1998, Rood et al. 1999). The next step in <br />cottonwood restoration is just commencing with the alteration <br />of river regulation patterns. Hughes and Rood (2003) recently <br />reviewed strategies for the restoration of floodplain wood- <br />lands, including two recent case studies documenting favor- <br />able cottonwood responses to deliberate changes in stream <br />flow regulation. <br />In one case study, chronic dewatering of the lower St. Mary <br />River in southern Alberta during the irrigation season led to <br />the loss of more than 90% of the riparian black and narrowleaf <br />Warm <br />Figure 3. Generalized adaptive ranges <br />of riparian cottonwoods of North <br />America with respect to temperature <br />and precipitation. Populus balsamifera, <br />P. trichocarpa and P. angustifolia are <br />in Populus section Tacamahaca, <br />whereas P. deltoides and P. fremontii <br />are in section Aigeiros along with the <br />European species P. nigra, which may <br />have an adaptive range generally simi- <br />lar to that of P. deltoides. <br />cottonwoods (P. trichocarpa and P. angustifolia) over the <br />half - century following the 1951 completion of the St. Mary <br />Dam (Rood and Mahoney 1995). Although flooding persisted <br />downstream from that dam, flood flows were followed by <br />abrupt flow decline that prevented successful cottonwood re- <br />cruitment. In 1995, a natural flood flow occurred and the St. <br />Mary Dam was managed to provide a relatively natural stage <br />recession rate of 4 cm day -' (Rood and Mahoney 2000). Sub- <br />stantial cottonwood seedling establishment resulted, in con- <br />trast to the lack of recruitment following the previous flood <br />years of 1964 and 1975. <br />The lower Truckee River in the high desert of western Ne- <br />vada provides an even more dramatic case study (Rood et al. <br />2003). This river was progressively dammed and dewatered, <br />leading to the collapse of the aquatic and riparian ecosystems. <br />Increased instream flows commenced in the early 1980s as <br />part of a program to restore an endangered endemic fish, the <br />cui -ui sucker (Chasmistes cujus). The collateral recruitment of <br />Fremont cottonwoods (P. fremontii) as well as sandbar and <br />other willows followed during 2 years in which the river stage <br />gradually receded at about 2.5 cm day -1 following the period <br />of seed release. The new cottonwoods continue to grow and <br />are reestablishing habitat for birds and other wildlife that had <br />been lost over the twentieth century. <br />Conclusion <br />Throughout the 1980s, several studies revealed the collapse of <br />riparian cottonwood forests downstream from dams in western <br />North America (Rood and Mahoney 1990). Investigations <br />throughout the 1990s have partially clarified the ecophysio- <br />logical dependency of riparian cottonwoods on stream flow <br />and revealed aspects of the morphological and physiological <br />adaptation of cottonwoods and willows to riparian floodplains. <br />TREE PHYSIOLOGY VOLUME 23, 2003 <br />0 <br />A <br />