My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-05-05_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977348
>
2014-05-05_HYDROLOGY - M1977348
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:43:45 PM
Creation date
5/13/2014 9:51:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977348
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
5/5/2014
Doc Name
Groundwater characterization report
From
Golder Associates
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 2014 10 10381640A <br />4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />4.1 Water Chemistry Data <br />In addition to the groundwater monitoring described in Section 2.4, Golder has performed quarterly <br />monitoring of wells MW -5, MW -6 and MW -7 since the first quarter of 2013. Analytical results for all <br />groundwater monitoring events are presented in Table 3 through Table 9. <br />In 2010, benchmarks levels were established for each constituent analyzed from the eight samples <br />collected from MW -2, MW -3, and MW -4 collected from April 1999 through July 2000. The methods are <br />described in the Groundwater SAP for the Boettcher Limestone Quarry (Golder 2010). In summary, <br />benchmarks were determined either from: <br />1. Regulatory standards listed in the Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment (CDPHE) Regulation 41, Basic Standards for Groundwater Tables 1 through <br />4 (Regulations); or <br />2. Intra -well statistical methods performed on background concentrations from April 1999 <br />through July 2000. <br />A detailed description of the methods used for determining benchmark levels was presented in the Golder <br />2010 Groundwater SAP. Observed constituent trends and benchmark exceedances for the wells with <br />established benchmark levels (MW -2, MW -3 and MW -4) are summarized below. For the wells without <br />established benchmark levels (MW -1, MW -5, MW -6, and MW -7), the constituent concentrations are <br />described relative to the other wells. A piper diagram depicting the major ion chemistry for the <br />groundwater samples is presented in Figure 4. <br />Concentration verses time plots for the entire data period (April 1999 to present) are presented in <br />Appendix D. The analyte list has been periodically modified since sampling began in April 1999, and the <br />discussion below only includes the 2013 analyte suite. <br />4.1.1 Monitoring Well MW -1 <br />Monitoring well MW -1 is located near the western edge of CKD disposal area A2 (Figure 1). Benchmark <br />analyte levels were not determined for well MW -1; however, constituent concentrations from MW -1 were <br />used to help evaluate the constituent concentrations from the hydraulically downgradient wells. <br />Groundwater samples collected from MW -1 are predominantly sodium - sulfate type waters (Figure 4). The <br />samples exhibited higher concentrations of dissolved calcium and magnesium but lower chloride and <br />alkalinity concentrations than those of the other Site wells (Appendix D). The MW -1 samples have pH <br />values ranging from 7.3 to 8.2, and remain consistent with values observed prior to CKD material <br />placement in disposal area A2. The MW -1 samples exhibited higher TDS concentrations than <br />Golder <br />i.ti0t 1640a� \ h iiin llfi r fnl- r 4 \1 1 Associates <br />8 0400 gwc arwe sla eld ep_ 30ap 1 038 640a gvcharrpt_holcim- bcettcher _ fnl- 28apria- with holcim edits <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.