2014-05-05_REVISION - C1996083 ‎(2)‎

• Permit No: C1996083
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 5/5/2014
• Doc Name: Adequacy Response #4
• From: J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: TR77
• Email Name: SLB
• Email Name: SB1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Susan Burgmaier -3- May 5, 2014
significant difference in the topsoil material that was projected to be salvaged in the
Gob Pile #3 disturbed area. The revised pages 2 and 4 of Volume Xl as well as
revised Appendix A do not provide an explanation why less topsoil is available for
reclamation than what was projected. Please revise pages 2 and 4 of Volume X1
to include an explanation for the discrepancy in the predicted and actual
topsoil salvage volume, as outlined in BRL's adequacy response letter.
BOW2: Please see revised page 10, Volume XI. The discussion was included in the
"Reclamation" section in order to be consistent with where the discussion was placed in
Volume IX. Please also see revised Volume Xl, Appendix A, which refers the reader back
to the discussion in the "Reclamation" section of the text.
7. DRMS: Please revise pages 14 and 95 and Appendix A of Volume IX to
include an explanation for the discrepancy in the predicted and actual topsoil
salvage volumes, as outlined in BRL's adequacy response letter.
BOW2: Please see revised page15 -16 and Appendix A, Volume IX.
8. DRMS: Please revise pages 2 and 4 of Volume XI to include an explanation for
the discrepancy in the predicted and actual topsoil salvage volume, as
outlined in BRL's adequacy response letter.
BOW2: Please see revised page 10, Volume XI. The discussion was included in the
"Reclamation" section in order to be consistent with where the discussion was placed in
Volume IX. Please also see revised Volume XI, Appendix A, which refers the reader back
to the discussion in the "Reclamation" section of the text.
9. Item Resolved.
10. DRMS: Please revise pages 2 and 4 of Volume X1 to include an explanation for the
discrepancy in the predicted and actual topsoil salvage volume, as outlined in BRL's
adequacy response letter.
BOW2: Please see revised page 10, Volume XI. The discussion was included in the
"Reclamation" section in order to be consistent with where the discussion was placed in
Volume IX. Please also see revised Volume XI, Appendix A, which refers the reader back
to the discussion in the "Reclamation" section of the text.
11. DRMS: The reclamation cost estimate has been revised and is being transmitted
to BRL under separate cover. The revised estimate results in a reclamation liability
increase of $107,857.68