My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-30_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2014-04-30_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:43:35 PM
Creation date
5/1/2014 7:27:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/30/2014
Doc Name
4th Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR77
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
William A. Bear <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />April 30, 2014 <br />material available for placement, and update the balance accordingly, or clarify that <br />BRL is proposing to relocate a portion of the previously placed cover material. <br />BRL: Please see revised Appendix A. It is not anticipated that Bowie would remove <br />the top 6" of native material before placement of topsoil, therefore Appendix A has <br />been revised accordingly. <br />DRMS 4130114: Revised Appendix A addressed this concern; this item is now resolved. <br />ii. DRMS: BRL, in Appendix A of Volume IX, has provided an updated estimate of the <br />volume of stockpiled topsoil. The revised estimate is considerably lower than the <br />previous estimate (42,472 cy as opposed to 72,521 cy approved with TR -76). Please <br />explain why the available topsoil volume estimate has decreased, and demonstrate <br />that this change is consistent with the requirements of Rules 4.06.2(a), 4.06.2(b), <br />and 4.06.4(2)(a). <br />BRL: The volume approved with TR -76 was based on a SurvCad calculated volume <br />(50,326 CY) and included estimated volumes from the borrow area, and the TR -72 & <br />TR -76 areas. The most recent volume calculated is believed to be accurate and what <br />is actually in each stockpile, not what might be available in the TR -76 expansion area. <br />If topsoil is available, it will be salvaged, but for reclamation estimates, it was left out <br />to be conservative in our calculations. <br />As discussed in Section 2.05.3(5) the amount of topsoil that is estimated for salvage <br />can be less than the amount of topsoil actually salvaged. The reasons listed in the <br />permit which apply for the gob pile area are: <br />1. Rocky soil material made topsoil salvage very difficult. <br />2. The steep terrain made topsoil salvage very difficult. <br />3. The soil survey assumed a constant topsoil salvage depth over the entire gob <br />pile area. The topsoil depth varies, from a few inches to over a foot. <br />The Operator believes they salvaged all topsoil that was available for salvage. <br />Page 2.05 -66 acknowledges a 6" replacement depth of topsoil on the gob piles is <br />marginal, however, nutrients or other soil amendment will be applied to redistributed <br />topsoil if necessary to support plant nutrient requirements. Therefore, the Operator <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.