Laserfiche WebLink
p body <br />Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC <br />36600 Routt County Rd. 27 <br />PO Box 250 <br />Hayden, CO. 81639 <br />(970) 276 -7001 <br />April 23, 2014 <br />RECEIVED <br />J' OYV-) <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment <br />Water Quality Control Division APR 2 5 2014 <br />Permits and Enforcement Section <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Division of Reclamation, <br />Denver, CO 80246 -1530 Mining & Safety <br />RE: Quarterly DMRs for CPDS Permit No. CO- 0048275, Peabody Sage Creek Mine <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br />Pursuant to the quarterly reporting requirements contained in Colorado Discharge Permit <br />CO- 0048275 for the Peabody Sage Creek Mine (PSCM), enclosed please find the first <br />quarter 2014 discharge monitoring reports for Outfalls 002, 003, and 004. In this quarter, <br />all three Outfalls discharged continuously. One excursion of the DMR limit for total <br />recoverable iron occurred during the first quarter of 2014, and an explanation of this <br />occurrence follows. <br />The sample collected at Outfall 004 on January 8, 2014 showed a total recoverable iron <br />value of 1,550 ug/L, which is greater than the DMR limit of 1,000 ug/L. This <br />information was relayed to Kelly Morgan of the Water Quality Control Division in an <br />email from me on February 12, 2014, the same day that I became aware of the excursion. <br />That same day, PSCM instructed ACZ laboratories to rerun total recoverable iron on the <br />remnant sample, and the result of the second analysis was 1,540 mg/L confirming the <br />original analytical result. On February 12, 2014, I talked with Chris Miller, PSCM's <br />contractor that collects NPDES samples during the winter months and asked if he noted <br />any conditions at Pond 004 that may have contributed to the excursion. Chris said no <br />unusual conditions were noted at the pond when he collected the sample on January 8, <br />2014 except for some minor debris in the discharge pipe that may have been causing <br />some constriction of flow. Chris said he collected the sample first, and then removed a <br />small amount of vegetation that had accumulated in the discharge pipe. The accumulated <br />vegetation may have contributed to the high total recoverable iron value. My review of <br />historical total recoverable data collected at Outfall 004 shows that the last excursion of <br />the total recoverable iron permit limit occurred on April 7, 2005 more than seven years <br />ago. Total recoverable iron values measured at Outfall 004 in February (110 ug/L) and <br />March (120 ug/L) of 2014 were well under the DMR effluent limit of 1,000 ug/L. <br />