My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-17_REPORT - M1977004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1977004
>
2014-04-17_REPORT - M1977004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2019 11:00:06 AM
Creation date
4/21/2014 10:49:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977004
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/17/2014
Doc Name
Annual Fee/Report/Map
From
Homestake Mining Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pitch Reclamation Project Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board — 2013 Annual Reclamation Report <br />4.3.3 Pinnacle Adit Flow <br />The flow rate from the Pinnacle adit at PP -01 has been monitored since November 1993. The flow from <br />the adit generally consists of a seasonal pattern of high flows during the short period of spring melt in late <br />May or early June and stable flows of less than 10 gallons per minute (gpm) throughout the year. The <br />spike in flows observed at PP -01 each spring are likely a result of snowmelt and runoff from surrounding <br />sources originating between the Pinnacle plug and the PP -01 monitoring point. Once the snowmelt <br />period is over, the flow rate at PP -01 decreases and stabilizes at normal levels. <br />The adit discharge is a direct reflection to the snow pack each year. This is shown clearly on the <br />hydrograph of the Pinnacle adit flow at PP -01 provided as Figure 5. In 2013, the snow pack was back to <br />a normal range compared to 2012 when the snow pack was significantly reduced and there was no spike <br />in adit discharge. The peak flow in 2013 was 20.0 gpm in June compared to 6.0 gpm in 2012 and 28.5 <br />gpm in 2011 and 22.6 gpm in 2010. <br />Dissolved radium 226 and total uranium have been monitored at PP -01 since March 1994. After <br />construction of the Pinnacle adit plug in September 1995, both the dissolved radium 226 and total <br />uranium concentrations have stabilized at reduced concentrations. A graph of the radium and uranium <br />concentrations at PP -01 is provided as Figure 6. During 2013, total uranium and dissolved radium 226 <br />levels remained at the reduced concentrations observed over the preceding seventeen -year period. <br />4.4 Sediment Control Embankment <br />The safety and efficiency of the sediment embankment is monitored with a network of surface and <br />subsurface systems. There are five permanent survey monuments where any physical movement of the <br />embankment can be measured and nine piezometers have been installed to monitor the phreatic surface <br />within the embankment. Five of the nine piezometers were installed during the initial construction in <br />1980, and four of the piezometers were completed in the core of the embankment in 2001. The 2013 <br />monument survey was performed on July 23 and results indicate the amount of vertical movement is <br />minimal and within the range of survey instrument error. No significant vertical displacement has <br />occurred since the initial settlement following construction. The pond level was maintained at 9,884 ft <br />amsl during 2013, except during the May reading, when the pond elevation had reached 9885 ft amsl. . <br />This was below the clay blanket repair top elevation of 9,885.5 ft. As a result, the water levels in the <br />piezometers showed little response to water stored in the impoundment in 2013. <br />Because piezometer P4 is in close proximity to the seepage area noted in 2000, it is monitored closely. <br />From 2005 to 2009 the water level in P4 was not falling back as rapidly as the other piezometers. It was <br />noted that when the probe was pulled out of both P4 and P5 it was covered with silt. The silt build up had <br />not allowed the pipes to drain sufficiently to accurately reflect the phreatic surface in the embankment. In <br />July 2009 both piezometers P4 and P5 were flushed with high pressure water in an attempt to minimize <br />the silt and other debris that had built up in the standpipes. The high pressure flushing resulted in the <br />water levels in both piezometers falling back to normal levels within a few days over the past two years, <br />with the average water level in P4 dropping by more than 4ft. Piezometer P5 also fell back rapidly after <br />being flushed. <br />Based upon the monitoring data and embankment inspections since 2001, it appears that the cutoff <br />trench and clay blanket reconstruction performed in 2001 have addressed the previous localized perched <br />zone and related seepage through the embankment core, thus, allowing the embankment to function as <br />designed. <br />Pitch 2013 Reclamation Report 14Apri12014.Docx 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.