My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-01_REVISION - M2006031 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2006031
>
2014-04-01_REVISION - M2006031 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:30:11 PM
Creation date
4/16/2014 5:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006031
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/1/2014
Doc Name
Preliminary adequacy review AM01
From
DRMS
To
Steel Rose 1, Inc.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />April 1, 2014 <br />Scott West <br />Steel Rose Inc. <br />8023 d Sreet <br />Colorado Spring, CO 80907 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />COLORADO <br />D IV IS I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />RE: Steel Rose 1; DRMS File No. M- 2006 -031; Amendment No. 1; Preliminary Adequacy <br />Review <br />Dear Mr. West, <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has completed its preliminary adequacy review <br />of your Limited Impact Operation 110(2) Reclamation Permit Amendment Application. The <br />application was received on February 20, 2014 and called complete for review on March 19, <br />2014. The decision date for this application is April 18, 2014. Please be advised that if you <br />are unable to satisfactorily address any concerns identified in this review before the <br />decision date, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of the review period. If <br />there are outstanding issues that have not been adequately addressed prior to the end of <br />the review period, and no extension has been requested, the Division will deny this <br />application. <br />The review consisted of comparing the application content with specific requirements of Rule <br />6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.5 of the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for Hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining Operations. In general the <br />application was substantially adequate, however, as with most applications there are a few items <br />that will require the submittal of additional information or clarification of the existing <br />information. Inadequacies are identified under the respective exhibit heading along with <br />suggested actions to correct them. <br />1.6.2 General Applicant Procedures <br />1. As required by Rule 1.6.2 (1)(g), please submit proof of the public notice that was placed in a <br />newspaper of general circulation. <br />6.3.1 Exhibit A — Legal Description and Location Map <br />2. The Applicant has provided the latitude/longitude coordinates for the proposed permitted <br />area. The coordinates do not define the proposed affected area of 9 acres, but rather define <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.