My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-09_REVISION - M1977493 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2014-04-09_REVISION - M1977493 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:43:06 PM
Creation date
4/10/2014 3:48:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/9/2014
Doc Name
Evaluation of clean water interceptor system TR18
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR18
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ray Lazuk <br />March 19, 2014 <br />Page 8 <br />flow planes and channel roughness coefficients of 0.1 for the collector channels were selected <br />based on ground surface characteristics. <br />3.5 Base Flow <br />The NRCS Fremont Pass SNOTEL site is located on Chalk Mountain near Fremont Pass, at the <br />southwest side of the Climax Mine site. The snowpack typically peaks in May and snowmelt <br />runoff typically occurs over about a 45 -day period in June and July. To account for the <br />scenarios where the 10 -year rainfall event could overlap the tail end of the snowmelt runoff <br />period, the drainage basins were modeled both with and without a snowmelt base flow. A <br />snowmelt base flow rate of 7.76 cfs per square mile of drainage basin area was used for this <br />analysis. This rate coincides with the 30 -day average snowmelt runoff from a 2 -year snowmelt, <br />based on a previous analysis of the Black Gore Creek basin near Vail. <br />The Clinton Canal portion of the East Interceptor was modeled with a base flow of 100 cfs to <br />account for possible releases from Clinton Reservoir. This is a conservative assumption, <br />because the Clinton Canal is typically operated at a much lower flow rate. A 1996 report by <br />Resource Engineering indicates that the Clinton Canal channel would begin to erode at a flow <br />rate of about 100 cfs even though the channel volumetric capacity is much greater. A base flow <br />of 100 cfs in the Clinton Canal was selected for this analysis because it is unlikely that the <br />Clinton Canal would intentionally be operated at a flow rate exceeding this limit. Note that <br />releases from Clinton Reservoir into the Clinton Canal are controlled by the Clinton Reservoir <br />Company. <br />4.0 FLOOD ROUTING CAPACITY <br />HEC -RAS geometry, including the cross - sectional dimension, alignment, and profile data, were <br />developed from the surveyed cross sections for each of the interceptors. A Manning's <br />roughness coefficient of 0.030 was used for the main channel and a Manning's roughness <br />coefficient of 0.035 was used for the left and right overbank areas in the HEC -RAS model. <br />These Manning's roughness values were selected to be somewhat conservative to produce a <br />deeper water depth. Lower Manning's roughness values would produce a slightly higher flow <br />velocity and lower water depth. Steady state and unsteady state simulations were used to route <br />the runoff hydrographs generated from the HEC -HMS model through each of the interceptors <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.