Laserfiche WebLink
Ray Lazuk <br />March 19, 2014 <br />Page 11 <br />The two parallel CMP culverts near Station 118 +00, shown in Photograph 4, do not match the <br />invert and slope of the channel. The size of these culverts is generally adequate. However, the <br />invert of one of the culverts is about six inches above the channel, and the other culvert is at a <br />negative slope. This causes water to back up in the channel at low flows and overtop the <br />channel at peak flows. <br />The 14 -inch HDPE culvert on the upper channel just before the confluence of the upper and <br />lower channels at about Station 58 +00 has sufficient capacity to pass the 10 -year rainfall event <br />but causes overtopping during the 10 -year rain -on -snow event. The existing 14 -inch HDPE <br />culvert at this location is shown in Photograph 5. <br />Lastly, the discharge end of the 24 -inch CMP culvert on the lower channel just before the <br />confluence of the upper and lower channels at about Station 58 +00 is damaged. The existing <br />24 -inch CMP culvert is shown in Photograph 6. <br />Diversion Structures <br />The flood routing capacities shown in the figures assume that the overflow structures at Kokomo <br />Creek and Searle Gulch function as intended. These structures were designed with overflow <br />provisions that would convey some unimpacted surface runoff into the Climax industrial area <br />during major storm events. This configuration is intended to protect the canal by preventing <br />uncontrolled overtopping if runoff flows exceed the interceptor capacity. The flood routing <br />abilities of the West Interceptor downstream of Kokomo Creek and Searle Gulch rely on the <br />existing overflow structures. Photograph 7 and Photograph 8 show the existing configuration of <br />the interceptor at these two locations. <br />For this analysis, the gates into the interceptor were assumed to be fully open, and all runoff <br />was routed through the interceptor until the headwater backed up to the crest of the respective <br />overflow structure. However, if the operators foresee the potential for overtopping in the <br />interceptor reach downstream of the diversion structure, these gates could be partially or fully <br />closed to bypass the interceptor. These gates are part of the management system to prevent <br />overtopping. <br />