My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2014-02-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:45 PM
Creation date
3/31/2014 1:27:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/6/2014
Doc Name
Vegetation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.10 Vegetation Information NH2 Mine Area
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
success standards can be developed without the use of reference areas with the exception of <br />dryland pasture. Baseline sampling during the 1987 field season reconfirmed the great <br />variation in management objectives of individuals and the highly diverse nature of the soils, <br />geology, and ground and surface water regimes. In many cases the management plans of <br />operators (both within and adjacent to the study area) changed weekly. This occurred even on <br />lands where Peabody had a reasonable level of control. Crop rotations or pasture and hayland <br />renovation could easily eliminate or change the nature of a reference area at the time of bond <br />release evaluations. Personal management objectives and methods are highly variable for the <br />various landowners or lessees. Irrigation water management, fertilization programs (if any), <br />harvest period, hay /pasture management, cropping, and grazing management were different <br />for nearly all landowners contacted. The end result of the above is a situation of no <br />guarantees. Guarantees of long term and somewhat consistent management are a critical <br />element that must be reasonably assured when using reference areas. Therefore, Peabody <br />has developed alternate reclamation standards as allowed for under 4.15.7(d) of the <br />Regulations. These standards are discussed in Section 2.05.4(2)(e), Revegetation. <br />For the 1999 vegetation baseline studies, sampling procedures were used that corresponded <br />with those agreed upon in the 1987 permit for sampling sagebrush, irrigated pasture, irrigated <br />hay, and swale/ drainage. In addition, three other plant communities occur in the proposed <br />permit expansion boundary but are outside the area of disturbance. These areas were agreed <br />to be described in a qualitative narrative. These communities are the flood plain of Tuttle draw, <br />a small area of deciduous trees fed by irrigation water on a north facing mesa side slope of the <br />Martin Property and a small area of Pinon and Juniper on a north facing mesa side slope of <br />WFC property. <br />Table 2.04.10 -3A summarizes sampling parameters and intensities for the various types in <br />1987. Table 2.04.10 -313 summarizes sampling parameters and intensities for the various <br />types in 1999. Details of sampling methods are provided following this summary. Data <br />Sampling Summary results are in Attachment 2.04.10 -3 Sampling Data Summary. <br />August 2013 (PR 08) 2.04.10 -11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.