My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-26_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-09-26_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:31:40 PM
Creation date
3/28/2014 7:28:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/26/2013
Doc Name
Permit Page Edits - Topsoil 2.05.4(2)(d)
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
proposed in the revegetation plan amd the potential for tipward salt rnevemiemt. As pointed otit im the report <br />Attachmemt 2.65.4(2)(d) 1, NR66 stated a 'eve' of 6.0 On the stibse" wotild not be detrimemts' to grasses ei alfalfa. <br />A sttidy dome by Gurtis Swift, PhE). of eelorade State University (Attaehmient 2.05.4(2)(d) 2), titled GaItTeleranee o <br />Varictis Temperate Zeme Grmarmental Plamts, shows that alfalfa handles a soil eemdtietiviby of 4 8rnrnhoiern. <br />specific speeies eited is Mediengo Sativa, which is the sarre as that preseribed in the revegetatiom plam for Irrigated <br />Greplamd. Alse this referemee does met differentitate between topsoil and stibsoil. Based on this date, amd NRGS <br />recomirnendat ems, the Irn6ts for Eleetrieal 6onductivity are shown in Table 2.05.4(2)(d) !A and 1 B for the vari <br />topso I and subsoil types. The averages will be reported for eaeh lamdowner in the So" Samplimg Report. <br />"= =USDA Soil Textures - unsuitable textures area: S -sand, LS -loamy sand, SC -Sandy clay: SIC -Silty clay, C -Clay <br />a=Me 3- inch -plus % is estimated visually (by volume) by sweeping the face of the area being inspected, measuring <br />out the area's depth, and then estimating boulders, cobbles, and stones using USDA criteria. The 3- inch -minus rock <br />fragment volume is estimated using sieve and collection pans. This is done by taking the thickness sample of the <br />material, placing it in a graduated sieve with a 2 mm final sieve size, and sieving the soil to the bottom of the sieve pan. <br />The volume of soil remaining in the 2 mm and larger sieves is then estimated for the 3- inch -minus rock fragment. <br />These two component measurements are then summed to give the Rock Fragments value. <br />=pH values in the table represent the acceptable range that sample pH must fall between. <br />August 2013 (PR -08) 2.05.4(2)(d) -9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.