My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-26_PERMIT FILE - M2013064
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2013064
>
2014-03-26_PERMIT FILE - M2013064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:41:25 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 4:17:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2013064
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/26/2014
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review Reply Comments
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In every instance, the size, volume, and methodology of the values and <br />factors influencing financial warranty are identical. Further, the values <br />utilized for the Western Sugar Project by OMLR via CIRCES, were used <br />for the values identified for the Varra - Coulson Project. <br />Now for the estimates: <br />Item I Varra Companies OMLR estimate ($) <br />estimate ($) <br />Total Warranty I $78,755.69± I $874,700.00± <br />Estimate <br />When compared to the larger Western Sugar Project, the Varra Companies <br />estimate is $24,222.76± less, or lower by 23.5± percent. When compared <br />to an extraction area that is slightly more than 12t percent larger at <br />Western Sugar, and a land area requiring resoiling and reseeding that is <br />46t percent smaller at the Varra- Coulson Project, along with slightly <br />lower percentages for the remaining values, the Varra Companies <br />estimate appears reasonable and consistent with previous OMLR <br />determinations. <br />So how do we examine and clarify the determinations to find common <br />ground with nearly an $800,000.00± difference in estimates recently <br />determined for the Varra Coulson Project? Let's look at the assumptions <br />for the various categories and see if we can better clarify and understand <br />them: <br />Category I OMLR estimate ($) I Varra Companies <br />estimate ($) <br />Dewatering <br />CIRCES used 63 acres <br />instead of the 59.3± <br />acres of estimated <br />surface water area. <br />CIRCES estimated <br />923,786 ',394.30 gallons <br />of water to discharge. <br />This is 160 percent <br />greater than the reported <br />extraction volume and <br />extrapolated water <br />Varra measured the <br />actual extraction <br />volume of <br />3,162,350.51 cu.yds. <br />of material within the <br />65.88± acre extraction <br />limits. The exposed <br />surface water area of <br />59.3± acres is 10 <br />percent smaller, and <br />we translated the total <br />Varra Companies, Inc. Coulson Resource Project OMLR M- 2013 -064 5 <br />Correspondence to Peter Hays 23 March 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.