Laserfiche WebLink
recognized in the original Design Report that tailing would have a lower strength at the time than <br />at final consolidation years later). <br />100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 800 850 <br />DISTANCE . FEET , <br />WTEM& <br />TT1+E <br />WTERPL <br />OESCNaP009 <br />UNIT WT (4�1) <br />94EM1 5TREMCTN <br />aial <br />aw <br />164 <br />C <br />U6A1{iRATEO TArIIIOS <br />105 <br />120 <br />.10 <br />300 <br />2 -14 <br />SATURAICD TAlF10i. <br />105 <br />120 <br />16 <br />300 <br />10WOWW FU <br />125 <br />133 <br />35 <br />0 <br />FOUND+TIOM SO& <br />125 <br />135 <br />35 <br />0 <br />-- .rmnww .wanes — . —1- — v — <br />u .n N — rot 1nnw.rtv w <br />SrARLnY ANALYSIS SUMMARY <br />FALLOtf <br />$TA Fos <br />A' L O$TATIO <br />YIEt.p 4A(XEL <br />i <br />z 44 <br />164 <br />MA <br />303 <br />ROT <br />N� <br />378 <br />2 -14 <br />243 <br />601 <br />202 <br />153 <br />-a.frr rnu.ca.+ a v+a4 <br />r - avr M-tuar ro �.s rrwc an.rA <br />(Reproduced from SPX, 1995) <br />Figure 4 Results of Upstream Stability Analyses <br />8850 <br />sow <br />8550 <br />$500 <br />8450 <br />700 <br />San Luis Project Miller Geotechnical Consultants <br />Tailing Dam Data Report 9 February 2014 <br />